An Exploratory Study of the Supervision of Ph.D./Research Students’ Theses

By Tricia Vilkinas. 2008

100 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, General Health Professions, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/451bb9fae6fa53f5806329838cd94b0a0d9de6fc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Antònia Darder
2. Jesús Aguiló Salinas
3. A. Pérez
4. M. L. Orellana

In General Health Professions

1. Antònia Darder
2. Jesús Aguiló Salinas
3. A. Pérez
4. M. L. Orellana

Citations in the corpus

• Improving Doctoral Success by Matching PhD Students with Supervisors (2016, background): “…roles, and abilities of the supervisor as key factors of the success of PhD candidates (Brown & Atkins, 1988; Buttery, Richter, & Filho, 2005; Cullen et al., 1994; Latona & Browne, 2001; Pearson & Brew, 2002; Quinn, 1988; Taylor & Beasley, 2005; Vilkinas, 2007; Vilkinas & Cartan, 2001, 2006).”
• Retheorizing doctoral supervision as professional work (2010, unknown): “(McWilliam 2002, 107) Scholars have sought to address this state of affairs by proposing models of supervision (e.g. Vilkinas 2007), or frameworks based on conceptions of research (Lee 2008) or developed for the purpose of reflective practice (Pearson and Kayrooz 2004).”