Social Image and the 50-50 Norm: A Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of Audience Effects
By James Andreoni. 2009
1,064 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Demography, General Decision Sciences, Safety Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d26d8d816f5dfbd167d6bc26112795c23fbc3582
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Demography
- John A. List
- David G. Rand
- Zachary Grossman
- James Konow
- Christoph Engel
- Magnus Johannesson
- Sonja Pointner
- Axel Franzen
In General Decision Sciences
- Jeffrey P. Carpenter
- Tore Ellingsen
- James Konow
- Colin F. Camerer
- Christoph Engel
- Magnus Johannesson
- John A. List
- Christine L. Exley
In Safety Research
- John A. List
- Jeffrey P. Carpenter
- James Konow
- Tore Ellingsen
- David G. Rand
- Magnus Johannesson
- Christine L. Exley
- David J. Cooper
Citations in the corpus
- Group Size and Incentives to Contribute: A Natural Experiment at Chinese Wikipedia (2011, background): “Douglas Bernheim 2009; Tore Ellingsen and Magnus Johannesson 2008; Adriaan R. Soetevant 2005; Mari Rege and Kjetil Telle 2004; Lakhani and von Hippel 2003; Yuqing Ren, Robert Kraut and Sara Kiesler 2007). These studies in general find that social effects encourage contribution. These studies except ”
- Fundraising through online social networks: A field experiment on peer-to-peer solicitation (2014, neutral): “” Related work has been conducted by Andreoni and Bernheim (2009), who examine audience effects on donation decisions, and by Karlan and McConnell (2012), who test for reputation effects on decision-making using giving circles.”
- The power of asking: How communication affects selfishness, empathy, and altruism (2011, background): “However, in our daily lives we are exposed to inequality regularly, but take costly actions to lessen it only in special circumstances, such as when asked to give a charitable donation (Andreoni and Payne, 2003; Landry et al., 2006) or observed by an audience (Andreoni and Bernheim, 2009).”
- Commitment and Behavior Change: Evidence from the Field (2013, background): “Commitment and Consistency The principle of consistency derives from cognitive dissonance theory, which suggests that individuals have an internal need to keep attitudes and beliefs in harmony (Festinger 1957).”
- Mixed feelings: Theories of and evidence on giving (2010, background): “One stylized fact is that long-run affect is 7 One possibility that Andreoni and Payne (2003) formalize and corroborate empirically is that private charities reduce fund-raising efforts, when they receive government grants.”
- Excusing Selfishness in Charitable Giving (2015, positive): “…from existing literature by documenting self-serving responses to objective risk in a social setting absent other factors, such as image concerns (Andreoni and Bernheim, 2009), information acquisition (Dana et al., 2006), ambiguity (Haisley and Weber, 2010), or actions of others (Falk and…”
- Dictator games: a meta study (2011, background): “A lottery determines whether the dictator's choice is implemented, or whether it is replaced by a random draw (a key contribution is Andreoni and Bernheim 2009).”
- The external validity of giving in the dictator game (2012, background): “…from other studies demonstrates that standard double blind procedures render less anonymity than methods with a random mechanism such as the randomized response technique (Franzen and Pointner 2012) or decision concealment by using a chance mechanism (Dana et al. 2007; Andreoni and Bernheim 2009).”
- Conveniently Upset: Avoiding Altruism by Distorting Beliefs About Others’ Altruism (2015, neutral): “5 See Andreoni and Bernheim (2009).”