The external validity of giving in the dictator game

By Axel Franzen, Sonja Pointner. Experimental Economics, 2012

155 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Decision Sciences, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b8e8e77a9e3e7333722759a56a5a0dbfa5487d74

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Decision Sciences

1. Stephan Billinger
2. Tania Singer
3. Nils Stieglitz
4. Stephen Mark Rosenbaum

In Safety Research

1. Anita Tusche
2. Stephan Billinger
3. Anne Böckler
4. Tania Singer
5. Nils Stieglitz
6. Stephen Mark Rosenbaum
7. Adam Brandenburger

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Anita Tusche
2. Anne Böckler
3. Tania Singer

Citations in the corpus

• What's the right thing to do? Increasing pro-sociality with simple moral nudges (2017, unknown): “…finding a positive association (Benz & Meier, 2008; Englmaier & Gebhardt, 2016; Exadaktylos, Espín & Brañas-Garza, 2013; Fehr & Leibbrandt, 2011; Franzen & Pointner, 2013), whereas others challenging this view by reporting only a weak association, if any at all (Galizzi & Navarro-Martinez,…”
• Let’s be honest: A review of experimental evidence of honesty and truth-telling (2014, background): “…of such field experiments include Stoop (2012) who reported forwarding rates of seemingly misdirected transparent envelopes with full cash contents intact of 50% in the Netherlands, while Franzen and Pointner (2013) observed forwarding rates of 52% and 69% in Germany and Switzerland, respectively.”
• The Structure of Human Prosociality (2016, background): “…for future studies will be to investigate the link of the identified subcomponents to spontaneous everyday-life prosocial behavior outside the laboratory, ranging from blood donations to timeconsuming helping behavior (for a recent external validation of the DG, see Franzen & Pointner, 2013).”