Self-construal predicts environmental concern, cooperation, and conservation

By Steven A. Arnocky, M. Stroink, Teresa L. Decicco. 2007

216 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d2479848eda2955ae6aed3623fcadea878088d96

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Building a model of commitment to the natural environment to predict ecological behavior and willingness to sacrifice (2011, background): “In a similar vein, Arnocky, Stroink, and DeCicco (2007) found that individuals engaged in greater conservation behavior to the extent that they included all living things in their self-construal.”
The Role of Regulatory Focus and Self-View in “Green” Advertising Message Framing (2012, background): “However, in the case of green advertising focusing on environmental appeals, consumer decisions are likely to also involve the consideration of global issues that transcend the personal domain (Arnocky, Stroink, and DeCicco 2007).”
Environmental psychology matters. (2014, background): “…people who relate to others) tend toward sharing resources; and those with meta-personal self-construal (i.e., individuals who feel fundamentally interconnected with all living things) tend to have biospheric values and to report they would cooperate more in a commons dilemma (Arnocky et al. 2007).”
Time Perspective and Sustainable Behavior (2014, background): “…that those who place greater emphasis on altruistic values tend to engage in more sustainable practices than those who emphasize egoistic values (Arnocky et al., 2007; Milfont, Sibley, & Duckitt, 2010; Schultz & Zelezny, 1999; Schwartz, 1992; Stern, Dietz, & Kalof, 1993; Stern, Dietz, Kalof, &…”
How the interplay between consumer motivations and values influences organic food identity and behavior (2018, background): “However, influencing levels of involvement and identity is not easily accomplished and may require a long-term and ambitious effort (e.g., Aertsens et al., 2009; Arnocky et al., 2007).”
The Relationship between Systems Thinking and the New Ecological Paradigm (2016, background): “Experiencing an affective connection to nature and wanting to protect the natural world because of its inherent rights to life involves an implicit understanding that the entire dynamic of socialecological life is profoundly interconnected and interdependent, which can then encourage ecologically co”
It's not easy being green: : the role of self-evaluations in explaining support of environmental issues (2014, result): “In contrast with psychological approaches about self-evaluations that often do not theoretically incorporate context (e.g., Arnocky et al., 2007; Fielding et al., 2008), we found that selfwork is situated in the sense of being connected to experiences with a particular issue in multiple contexts.”
Cultural antecedents of green behavioral intent: An environmental theory of planned behavior (2015, background): “Self-construal has been linked to socially responsible behavior, where people with a higher level of interdependence deliberated more on collective outcomes when making decisions (Arnocky, Stroink, & deCicco, 2007; McCarty & Shrum, 2001), while independence predicted egoistic environmental concern (”
Greening organizations through leaders' influence on employees' pro-environmental behaviors (2013, unknown): “Additionally, Arnocky, Stroink, and DeCicco (2007) suggest that metapersonal self-construal (inclusion of all living things in the perception of the self; Stroink & DeCicco, 2007) predicts environmental concern and behaviors.”