Accessing Recent Events

By Brian McElree. 2006

354 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d1afa25cc01df1f45a380f13e8848b7a448a7801

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

A test of the relation between working-memory capacity and syntactic island effects (2012, background): “…not resolved immediately, so either it needs to be actively maintained in working memory until it can be licensed and interpreted (Wanner & Maratsos, 1978); or it must be retrieved into active processing later in the sentence, a process which takes time and is potentially errorful (McElree, 2006).”
Agreement Attraction in Comprehension: Representations and Processes. (2009, background): “One way to capture the pattern of effects observed in these comprehension experiments is to assume that subject–verb agreement is always computed through a cuebased retrieval process that is engaged when the verb is encountered (Lewis & Vasishth, 2005; McElree, 2006).”
A content-addressable pointer mechanism underlies comprehension of verb-phrase ellipsis (2008, methodology): “Several studies have demonstrated that temporal and spatial order information are recovered with a serial search mechanism (Gronlund, Edwards, & Ohrt, 1997, McElree, 2001, 2006; McElree & Dosher, 1993).”
Working Memory and Attention – A Conceptual Analysis and Review (2019, neutral): “…within WM comes from three observations: (1) In short-term recognition tests the last-presented item in a list is accessed at a faster rate than preceding items, and this has been interpreted as showing that the last-encoded item remains in the focus of attention (for a review McElree, 2006).”
The mind and brain of short-term memory. (2008, methodology): “McElree (2006) directly tested this prediction using a version of his response-deadline recognition task, in which subjects were given a retention interval between presentation of the list and the probe rather than presented with the probe immediately after the list.”
Similarity-based interference in sentence comprehension: Literature review and Bayesian meta-analysis (2017, background): “One appeal of this account is that it assumes the same memory access mechanism for language processing that governs recall in general information processing (Watkins & Watkins, 1975; Anderson & Lebiere, 1998; Anderson et al., 2004; McElree, 2006; Ratcliff, 1978; Van Dyke, 2002).”
Attention to Information in Working Memory (2012, background): “On the other hand, work by Garavan (1998) and McElree (2006) has demonstrated a privileged status of a single item in working memory, suggesting a one-item focus of attention.”
The role of prominence in pronoun resolution: Active versus passive representations (2007, methodology): “Recency affects asymptotic accuracy, with lower performance for less recent items, but it does not affect the dynamics of the time-course functions (McElree, 1996, 1998, 2001, 2006; McElree & Dosher, 1989, 1993; Wickelgren et al., 1980).”
Consciousness and cognitive access (2008, neutral): “(For work that suggests less than four, see McElree 2006.)”
Parsing and Working Memory in Bilingual Sentence Processing (2016, background): “Such models assume that the amount of information that can be activated in the focus of attention at one time is severely limited and much smaller than is measured in span tasks (Cowan, 2001; McElree, 2006).”