Working Memory and Attention – A Conceptual Analysis and Review

By Klaus Oberauer. Journal of Cognition, 2019

490 citations recorded by the source corpus.

There is broad agreement that working memory is closely related to attention. This article delineates several theoretical options for conceptualizing this link, and evaluates their viability in light of their theoretical implications and the empirical support they received. A first divide exists between the concept of attention as a limited resource, and the concept of attention as selective information processing. Theories conceptualizing attention as a resource assume that this resource is responsible for the limited capacity of working memory. Three versions of this idea have been proposed: Attention as a resource for storage and processing, a shared resource for perceptual attention and memory maintenance, and a resource for the control of attention. The first of these three is empirically well supported, but the other two are not. By contrast, when attention is understood as a selection mechanism, it is usually not invoked to explain the capacity limit of working memory – rather, researchers ask how different forms of attention interact with working memory, in two areas. The first pertains to attentional selection of the contents of working memory, controlled by mechanisms of filtering out irrelevant stimuli, and removing no-longer relevant representations from working memory. Within working memory contents, a single item is often selected into the focus of attention for processing. The second area pertains to the role of working memory in cognitive control. Working memory contributes to controlling perceptual attention – by holding templates for targets of perceptual selection – and controlling action – by holding task sets to implement our current goals.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d570f95b1f59040457571572be35f9b28739b2d4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

Forty years after Feature Integration Theory (2020, background): “The ability of working memory representations to influence search has been the subject of much recent research (e.g. Dowd, Pearson, & Egner, 2017; Foerster & Schneider, 2018; Hollingworth & Beck, 2016; Kristjánsson, Thornton, & Kristjánsson, 2018; Oberauer, 2019).”
Hemisphere-specific parietal contributions to the interplay between working memory and attention (2021, background): “cases but not others, or what neural functions underpin the relationship between the demands (cf. Lorenc, Mallett, & Lewis-Peacock, 2021; Oberauer, 2019).”