The mind and brain of short-term memory.

By John Jonides, Richard L. Lewis, Derek Evan Nee, Cindy Lustig, Marc G. Berman, Katherine Sledge Moore. 2008

933 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

Dopamine Is Required for Learning and Forgetting in Drosophila (2012, positive): “In addition, it may be that other mechanisms implicated in forgetting, such as proactive interference, retroactive interference, mental exertion, and stress (Jonides et al., 2008; Wixted, 2004), function by modulating the activity of the dopamine-based forgetting mechanism described here.”
Source monitoring 15 years later: What have we learned from fMRI about the neural mechanisms of source memory? (2009, background): “…processes (e.g., initiating, refreshing, selecting, reviving, evaluating) and how they combine under different agendas to remember (Dobbins & Han, 2006; Johnson & Hirst, 1993; Ranganath & Blumenfeld, 2005; see also, e.g., Hassabis & Maguire, 2007; Jonides et al., 2008; Uncapher & Rugg, 2008).”
Alignment and task success in spoken dialogue (2014, background): “In this case, the selection of syntactic rules is influenced by interference from more recent syntactic structures even if they are inappropriate in light of contextual or semantic constraints (see Jonides et al., 2008, for a review of the two views of short-term memory).”
The Biology of Forgetting – A Perspective (2017, background): “…management system, such as themajor processes of acquisition and consolidation (Figure 2; Squire, 1987; Menzel and Muller, 1996; McGaugh, 2000; Dudai, 2004; Davis, 2005; Shema et al., 2007; Jonides et al., 2008; Wang and Morris, 2010; Johansen et al., 2011; Kandel et al., 2014; Dudai et al., 2015).”
Dissecting neural pathways for forgetting in Drosophila olfactory aversive memory (2015, background): “Rooted respectively in the concepts of decay and interference (32, 77), these two forms of forgetting have notable and interesting distinctions.”
Emotional Interference in Working Memory is Related to Rumination (2012, background): “Working memory refers to the capacity to simultaneously store and process information (Jonides et al. 2007).”
The Distributed Nature of Working Memory. (2017, background): “More recent accounts of distributed working memory have emphasized different timescales of retention in different brain areas [140,141], the role of attentional processes in the retention of memories [4,11,142], and the utility of synaptic plasticity and dynamic firing trajectories for working memor”
The Cognitive Benefits of Interacting With Nature (2008, background): “Additionally, recent research has implicated an important role for directed attention in short-term memory (see Jonides et al., 2008) and school success (Diamond, Barnett, Thomas, & Munro, 2007).”
Chutes Versus Ladders: Anchoring Events and a Punctuated-Equilibrium Perspective on Social Exchange Relationships (2010, background): “This autobiographical information is stored in varying levels of specificity in both the longterm and short-term memory systems, although for this theory we concern ourselves with storage in and retrieval from long-term memory, which is memory of items stored longer than a few seconds (Jonides et al”
Forgetting is regulated through Rac activity in Drosophila. (2010, neutral): “Traditionally, two psychological concepts, usually placed in opposition, have been raised to account for forgetting: decay and interference (Jonides et al., 2008; Wixted, 2004).”
Directed Attention as a Common Resource for Executive Functioning and Self-Regulation (2010, background): “Along these same lines, Zeigarnik (1927) demonstrated that unresolved problems tend to lead to persisting memories; further, such unresolved problems could produce interference and thus hinder cognitive functioning for other tasks (Berman, Jonides, & Lewis, 2009; Jonides et al., 2008; Lewandowsky, G”
Phonological similarity effects in simple and complex span tasks (2011, result): “Several other fMRI experiments have subsequently replicated this result, and lateral prefrontal and posterior parietal areas are commonly thought to contribute to WM function (for a review, see Jonides et al., 2008).”