The role of prominence in pronoun resolution: Active versus passive representations

By Stephani Foraker, Brian McElree. 2007

140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f95b4d64fa5a3d33502fe61f143efd8e1fbadf24

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Colin Phillips
2. Brian Dillon
3. Alan Mishler
4. Kumiko Fukumura
5. Shayne Sloggett
6. Roger P. G. van Gompel

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Kumiko Fukumura
2. Roger P. G. van Gompel
3. Colin Phillips
4. Brian Dillon
5. Alan Mishler
6. Shayne Sloggett

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Kumiko Fukumura
2. Roger P. G. van Gompel
3. Colin Phillips
4. Brian Dillon
5. Alan Mishler
6. Shayne Sloggett

Citations in the corpus

• Contrasting intrusion profiles for agreement and anaphora: Experimental and modeling evidence (2013, background): “…as subject–verb agreement, filler–gap processing, licensing of negativepolarity items (NPIs), verb-phrase ellipsis, and referential processing (Foraker & McElree, 2007; Lewis & Vasishth, 2005; Lewis et al., 2006; Martin & McElree, 2008, 2009; McElree et al., 2003; Vasishth et al., 2008;…”
• The effect of animacy on the choice of referring expression (2011, background): “Alternatively, language users may not actively maintain discourse entities in capacity-constrained focal attention (Foraker & McElree, 2007), and thus an entity’s accessibility may not be constrained by the accessibility of other entities.”