Virtuality, communication, and new product team creativity: a social network perspective

By Roger Th. A. J. Leenders, J. Engelen, Jan Kratzer. 2003

585 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d12c2c138a612e6be49524601b6ceeb439632a17

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. John E. Mathieu
2. M. Maynard
3. Lucy L. Gilson
4. Carmen Binnewies
5. Sabine Sonnentag
6. Sandra Ohly
7. Yunhyung Chung
8. Allan Friedman

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Sabine Sonnentag
2. Carmen Binnewies
3. Sandra Ohly
4. Christina E. Shalley
5. Lucy L. Gilson
6. John E. Mathieu
7. Jing Zhou
8. David M. J. Lazer

In Social Psychology

1. Sandra Ohly
2. Sabine Sonnentag
3. Lucy L. Gilson
4. Carmen Binnewies
5. John E. Mathieu
6. M. Maynard
7. Christina E. Shalley
8. T. Ruddy

Citations in the corpus

• Taking personal initiative and communicating about ideas: What is important for the creative process and for idea creativity? (2007, background): “Previous research on the relationship between communication and performance produced mixed empirical evidence (Brodbeck, 2001; Leenders et al., 2003).”
• Virtual Teams: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go From Here? (2004, background): “Finally, for creativity, both very low and very high levels of interaction among CMC group members were found to be detrimental (Leenders et al., 2003).”
• Structuring for team success: The interactive effects of network structure and cultural diversity on team potency and performance (2014, unknown): “It could be that greater task complexity would have required less centralized networks for effective task performance, a pattern that would fit the findings reported in the study of new product development teams in the electronics industry (Leenders et al., 2003).”
• Virtual Teams: A Literature Review (2009, background): “(Bal and Teo, 2001a, Paul et al ., 2005, Wong and Burton, 2000, Cascio and Shurygailo, 2003, Leenders et al ., 2003) Small team size (Bal and Teo, 2001a) Team member are knowledge workers (Bal and Teo, 2001a, Kirkman et al ., 2004) Team members may belong to different companies (Dafoulas and…”
• The Internal and External Networks of Knowledge-Intensive Teams (2013, background): “For this reason, most team-level network studies assess strength of relationships among team members, differentiating between at least three degrees of tie strength (Baldwin et al., 1997; Leenders et al., 2003; Oh et al., 2004; Rulke & Galaskiewicz, 2000; Shah, Dirks, & Chervany, 2006; Sparrowe et a”