Toward an integrative science of the person.

By Walter Mischel. Annual Review of Psychology, 2004

857 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d108f412512696ceb8c13bd7419b1ace834bd42c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Beyond Culture Learning Theory (2013, background): “Although these variables may be associated with the characteristics of the cross-cultural transition, sojourner resources, and social interactions, we refer to them broadly as situational factors to contrast them with personality measures and to account for the influence of person and situation-cent”
A SITUATIONAL JUDGMENT TEST OF PERSONAL INITIATIVE AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO PERFORMANCE (2009, background): “Individuals are thus characterized by their distinctive patterns of variability in their actions across different situations (Mischel, 2004).”
Resisting Everything except Temptation: Evidence and an Explanation for Domain–specific Impulsivity (2012, background): “standard practice of averaging across domains can obscure important individual differences (Mischel, Shoda, & Mendoza-Denton, 2002), examining domains as variables of interest can provide a more nuanced and accurate view of personality. As Shoda et al. (1994), Weber et al. (2002), and the current in”
The role of the situation in leadership. (2007, background): “Mischel (2004) referred to these as “if . . . then . . . relationships” (p. 8), and we have called them decision rules.”
'Taking a sickie': Job satisfaction and job involvement as interactive predictors of absenteeism in a public organization (2007, methodology): “…vs. organization) but can also be found for attitudes with the same target (the job) by drawing on basic principles in personality research regarding strong and weak situations (Mischel, 2004) and insights about the marked situational variability of job satisfaction judgments (e.g. Weiss, 2002).”
Prosocial Behavior and Religion: New Evidence Based on Projective Measures and Peer Ratings (2005, background): “As argued elsewhere (Saroglou in press), if we follow the person-situation interaction debate (Funder 2001; Mischel 2004), it is to be expected that the size of the effect of religion on prosocial behavior varies importantly as a function of context.”
Impulsivity, Offending, and the Neighborhood: Investigating the Person–Context Nexus (2012, background): “For example, Cadoret et al. (1995) showed that genetic-environmental interactions account for significant variation in antisocial behavior; and Caspi et al. (2002) found that the association between maltreatment and delinquency is conditional on genotype (also see Christiansen 1977; Magnusson 1988; ”
The media inequality: Comparing the initial human-human and human-AI social interactions (2017, background): “While the promise of consistence across human-human interactions to human-machine interactions is held by the CASA scholars, social psychologists cast doubts over the psychological invariance that distinctively characterizes an individual across diverse situations (Mischel, 2004).”
Expanding the Dimensions of Epistemic Cognition: Arguments From Philosophy and Psychology (2011, background): “Social psychologists have found great situational variation in many personality traits and dispositions (Mischel, 2004).”
The generalizability crisis (2019, background): “Today, digital trace data provides new opportunities for rich measurement that captures behavioral, situational, and environmental/contextual factors simultaneously (Lazer et al., 2020; Mischel, 2004).”
Abusive Supervision Through the Lens of Employee State Paranoia (2014, background): “For personality psychologists, individual differences cap- ture between-person variation in the cognitive schemas and interpretive filters that people use to detect, organize, interpret and respond to stimuli in their social environments (Mischel, 2004; Schneider, 1983).”