Consumers' preferences for locally produced food: A study in southeast Missouri
By Cheryl L. Brown. 2003
399 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Conservation, Food Science, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d0d32bda7997c1bccb40287b711667742092a974
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Conservation
- R. Nayga
- Marianna Aprile
- Vincenzina Caputo
- O. Isengildina-Massa
- C. Tong
- Chengyan Yue
- Carlos E. Carpio
In Food Science
- R. Nayga
- Vincenzina Caputo
- Marianna Aprile
- O. Isengildina-Massa
- C. Tong
- Chengyan Yue
- Carlos E. Carpio
In Plant Science
- Vincenzina Caputo
- R. Nayga
- Marianna Aprile
- O. Isengildina-Massa
- Carlos E. Carpio
- C. Tong
- Chengyan Yue
Citations in the corpus
- Evaluating the Economic Impact of Farmers' Markets Using an Opportunity Cost Framework (2008, background): “Many consumers also like the idea that they are supporting local agriculture, especially small local farms, and helping to retain dollars in the local economy (Brown, 2003; FPC).”
- Organic or Local? Investigating Consumer Preference for Fresh Produce Using a Choice Experiment with Real Economic Incentives (2009, background): “Previous studies that focused on consumers’ choices at farmers’ markets in other states showed that today’s consumers support local farmers’ markets because they expect higher quality (for example, freshness and taste) and lower prices (Brown, 2002, 2003).”
- Local Food Systems: Concepts, Impacts, and Issues (2012, background): “72 Local Food Systems: Concepts, Impacts, and Issues / ERR-97 Economic Research Service/USDA Appendix Table 2 Characteristics associated with willingness to pay more for local foods Author, year Location Food type Methods Findings Brown, 2003 Southeast Missouri All food Mail survey Asked if responde”
- Local versus organic: A turn in consumer preferences and willingness-to-pay (2010, neutral): “Brown 67 and Schneider and Francis 68 found similar results for Missouri and Nebraska, respectively.”
- Consumer willingness to pay for locally grown products: the case of South Carolina (2009, background): “In contrast, Brown (2003) indicated that 58% of surveyed Missouri consumers were unwilling to pay a premium for locally grown food products if they were of the same quality as other products.”
- Who Buys Local Food (2006, neutral): “Other characteristics associated with those who purchase local produce include farm background and membership in environmental groups (Brown 2003). Attitudinal and behavioral characteristics generally are better predictors of local food buying behavior than are demographic characteristics; research ”
- The valuation and purchase of food products that combine local, regional and traditional features: The influence of consumer ethnocentrism (2018, background): “Some consumer studies consider local food to be food produced within the same county (Groves, 2005), whereas others consider larger frontiers, such as the state (Darby, Batte, Erst, & Roe, 2008) and even the nation (Brown, 2003).”
- Consumers’ Preferences and Attitudes Toward Local Food Products (2016, methodology): “To detect consumers’ attitudes toward local foods (e.g., points 3 and 4), respondents were asked to specify the importance of various traditional factors (see Table 1) drawing from the consumer literature (Brown, 2003; Tregear & Ness, 2005; Onozaka et al., 2010).”
- Comparing Willingness to Pay for Organic, Natural, Locally Grown, and State Marketing Program Promoted Foods in the Mid-Atlantic Region (2011, background): “With Hu et al. (2010) suggesting that many consumers view “local” to mean within less than 100 miles, and Brown (2003) finding that in Missouri “local” was often viewed as a region smaller than the state’s border, “local” may seem more supportive of a consumer’s area than a state-wide promotion in…”