Attachment style and intimacy in friendship

By C. Grabill, Kathryn A. Kerns. 2000

144 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cf5e756bb27aaf9c922554bc8d197e224dc90c57

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Childhood Emotional Abuse and the Attachment System Across the Life Cycle: What Theory and Research Tell Us (2010, background): “A high level of anxiety in relationships and doubt that they can be understood, validated, and loved by a romantic partner (Grabill & Kerns, 2000) can result in relational dissatisfaction, negative attributions for partner’s transgressions, and romantic jealousy (Collins, 1996; Collins & Feeney,…”
Adolescents' Attachment Representations and Their Capacity for Intimacy in Close Relationships. (2007, background): “…with reports of higher self-disclosure (e.g., Mayseless, 1993), responsiveness to partner’s disclosure, and feeling validated and understood in the friendship; however, observations of intimate communication provided only limited support for this reported association (Grabill & Kerns, 2000).”
Let's be friends: Relational self‐construal and the development of intimacy (2006, background): “Attachment styles have been a frequent focus of researchers interested in individual differences in the development of close relationships ( Grabill & Kerns, 2000; Mikulincer & Nachshon, 1991; see Collins & Feeney, 2004; Laurenceau, Rivera, Schaffer, & Pietromonaco, 2004 for reviews).”
Stress reactivity to co-rumination in young women’s friendships: Cortisol, alpha-amylase, and negative affect focus (2011, background): “Close, high-quality same-sex friendships serve as core sources of social support for females during adolescence through at least young adulthood (Carbery & Buhrmester, 1998; Grabill & Kerns, 2000; Taylor, 2006; Rubin, Bukowski, & Parker, 1998), and likely beyond.”
The Role of Peer Relationships in Adjustment to College (2008, background): “Individuals who are more securely attached are more likely to self–disclose to friends (Mikulincer & Nachslon, 1991), report greater intimacy (Grabill & Kerns, 2000), and expect more support, trust, and acceptance from friends (You & Malley–Morrison, 2000).”
Parent—adolescent relationship qualities, internal working models, and attachment styles as predictors of adolescents’ interactions with friends (2009, result): “Mixed support for linkages between attachment styles and friendship interactions has also been found in prior work with late adolescents (Grabill & Kerns, 2000).”
Leader and follower attachment styles: Implications for authentic leader–follower relationships (2014, background): “For example, as the table indicates, secure attachmenthas been associatedwith self-awareness (e.g. Mikulincer, 1995), relational transparency (e.g. Grabill & Kerns, 2000), balanced processing (e.g. Gentzler & Kerns, 2006), an internalized moral perspective (Popper, 2002), and authenticity in…”
Attachment in the Classroom (2009, background): “Even in college, secure freshmen report feeling more validated and cared for (Grabill and Kerns 2000) and have a larger, high-quality social support network (Anders and Tucker 2000).”
Mobile Communication in Romantic Relationships: Mobile Phone Use, Relational Uncertainty, Love, Commitment, and Attachment Styles (2010, background): “For instance, avoidant or anxious individuals are less likely to engage in self-disclosure (Grabill & Kerns, 2000) and supportive communication (Mikulincer, Florian, & Weller, 1993), as compared with less avoidant and less anxious individuals.”