Emotion in Concepts

By Howard Moskowitz, S. Porretta, Matthias Silcher. 2008

399 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ce89536dce7b72d3c780bb722bb661d94e09d5d7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Content and process priming: A review ☆ (2014, unknown): “Semantic network models of emotion (see Niedenthal, 2008, for a discussion of relevant models) propose that emotional experience can be represented in a semantic network.”
Anxious or Angry? Effects of Discrete Emotions on the Perceived Helpfulness of Online Reviews (2014, background): “In the best-known dimensional framework, Russell’s (1980) circumplex model, valence (pleasant versus unpleasant) and arousal (activated versus deactivated) define a two-dimensional space onto which the universe of emotions is mapped (Niedenthal 2008).”
Keep Your Cool or Let it Out: Nonlinear Effects of Expressed Arousal on Perceptions of Consumer Reviews (2017, background): “In contrast, the present research focuses on expression of emotional arousal, defined as the level of energy characterizing an emotional experience (Niedenthal 2008; Russell 1980).”
Emotion and emotion-laden words in the bilingual lexicon (2008, background): “…and O’Connor, 1987) and on semantic and pragmatic analyses (Kövecses, 1986, 1990, 2000; Wierzbicka, 1994) and is shared by a number of linguists (Kövecses, 1986, 1990, 2000; Lakoff, 1987; Wierzbicka, 1994), psychologists (Fehr and Russell, 1984; Shaver et al., 1987; Russell, 1991a, b;…”
Gender and Emotion (2013, background): “Emotion words comprise a low proportion of conversation, and emotions (e.g., anger) are frequently described through metaphors (e.g., steamed) or figures of speech (e.g., ticked off)—when they are referenced at all (Gibbs, Leggitt, & Turner, 2002; Kövecses, 1990; Shields & MacDowell, 1987).”
Awe Activates Religious and Spiritual Feelings and Behavioral Intentions (2012, background): “A second, complementary, explanation could be related to the fact that current emotions lead individuals to more quickly categorize stimuli that are congruent with the current emotional state, but not those that are incongruent (Niedenthal, 2008).”
Metaphor and metonymy: Making their connections more slippery (2010, background): “Ritchie (2006: 156) says, in referring mainly to metaphor, ‘‘figurative use of language may itself constitute a field of meaning, with dimensions such as conceptuality, opaqueness, literalness, triteness, formality, folkishness among others,’’ and Cameron (1999b) has provided nine dimensions on…”
The relevance of emotion for language and linguistics (2012, background): “It has been claimed (Kövecses 1990) that the property of abstractness explains the abundant use of figurative speech (in particular metaphor) in discourse about emotions.”
Measuring respect in close relationships (2006, methodology): “Kovecses (1990) performed a linguistic analysis of respect as an emotion concept, in other words, as a prototypical cognitive model.”