Unobserved Heterogeneity as an Alternative Explanation for 'Reversal' Effects in Behavioral Research
By Wagner A. Kamakura. 2000
161 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences, Marketing
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ce7d6674613a87ad28b9e5445fb94feb377098d3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Raj Mehta
- Kathryn M. Sharpe
- Christine Eckert
- Richard Staelin
- Stacey L. Davis
- Joel Huber
- Rajdeep Grewal
- Paul F. Burke
In General Decision Sciences
- Raj Mehta
- Christine Eckert
- Stacey L. Davis
- Karen Donohue
- Joel Huber
- Rajdeep Grewal
- Paul F. Burke
- Frank Kardes
In Marketing
- Christine Eckert
- Stacey L. Davis
- Raj Mehta
- Joel Huber
- Rajdeep Grewal
- Paul F. Burke
- Frank Kardes
- Duncan J. Watts
Citations in the corpus
- The Timing of Repeat Purchases of Consumer Durable Goods: The Role of Functional Bases of Consumer Attitudes (2004, result): “As such, our research endeavor is similar in spirit to recent research that integrates insights from behavioral and marketing science research (e.g., Hutchinson, Kamakura, and Lynch 2000; Simonson and Winer 1992).”
- Individual differences in the newsvendor problem: Behavior and cognitive reflection (2013, background): “For example, research in cognitive psychology (Stanovich and West, 2000) and consumer behavior (Hutchinson et al., 2000) identified unobserved heterogeneity, also known as individual differences.”
- Segmenting consumers’ reasons for and against ethical consumption (2014, background): “In general, segments of consumers might differ in their reasoning when evaluating ethical products; if this is the case, an aggregate approach to understand reason-based ethical choices will be inadequate (Hutchinson et al., 2000).”
- Using Extremeness Aversion to Fight Obesity: Policy Implications of Context Dependent Demand (2008, background): “This is important since multiple types of individual level behavior could lead to the same aggregate level results (Hutchinson et al. 2000; Wernerfelt 1995).”