People, Products, and Pursuits: Exploring the Relationship between Consumer Goals and Product Meanings
By Mark S. Ligas. 2000
106 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Marketing, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ce44c9b615413ea8dea59f39ceec3a1638ebd3d8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Marketing
- Marco Wolf
- Judy A. Siguaw
- Anna S. Mattila
- Simone Pettigrew
- John B. Ford
- S. Charters
- S. McQuitty
- Heesup Han
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Marco Wolf
- A. Sargeant
- Anna S. Mattila
- Simone Pettigrew
- S. Charters
- S. McQuitty
- Heesup Han
- Yany Grégoire
Citations in the corpus
- Charity Brand Personality: The Relationship With Giving Behavior (2008, background): “In electing to purchase brands with particular personalities, consumers can thus seek to convey representations of themselves (Fournier, 1991; Ligas, 2000) and/or reinforce their self-image.”
- Understanding the do-it-yourself consumer: DIY motivations and outcomes (2011, background): “People can distinguish themselves from others through their behaviors, but also through products that offer symbolic meaning beyond their functional benefits (Ligas 2000).”
- A re-examination of the generalizability of the Aaker brand personality measurement framework (2003, background): “…some scholars interested in brand management have offered conceptualizations of brands that include symbolic components (e.g., Keller, 1993, 1998; Ligas, 2000; Park, Jaworski and MacInnis, 1986; Park and Srinivasan, 1994), few valid measurement Journal of Strategic Marketing ISSN 0965–254X…”
- Why Do People Drink Wine? A Consumer-Focused Exploration (2008, background): “The paradigm which is adopted here for the analysis of consumer motivation is a tripartite one, based on the idea that products fulfil needs which may be utilitarian and physical (eg, Thompson & Vourvachis, 1995 ), symbolic ( Levy, 1986 ), and experiential ( Holbrook & Hirschman, 1982 ), or, more u”