Comparison of Family and Nonfamily Business: Financial Logic and Personal Preferences

By M. Gallo, J. Tápies, Kristin Cappuyns. 2004

417 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ce0fe5bb7f7c5b18d4fcbeeab68f47f175acdd62

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

The Internationalization of Family Firms (2014, background): “…over the company as possible, while preserving the wealth for future generations, some studies argue that family firms are less prone to internationalize, and find this supported in their data (Donckels & Fröhlich, 1991; Fuentes-Lombardo & Fernandez-Ortiz, 201; Gallo et al., 2004; Okoroafo, 19990).”
Financial Structure of the Family Business: Evidence From a Group of Small Spanish Firms (2007, background): “The family nature of a business influences its capital structure so that the financial behavior of family and nonfamily businesses is expected to differ significantly (Gallo & Vilaseca, 1996; Gallo et al., 2004; McConaughy & Phillips, 1999; Poutziouris, 2001).”
Upper echelons theory in management accounting and control research (2014, background): “…the hierarchical level of the CFOs under investigation (e.g., Geiger and North 2006; Naranjo-Gil et al. 2009; Pavlatos 2012; Burkert and Lueg 2013), while others also deliberately include CFOs from the second, third, or lower levels (Gallo and Vilaseca 1998; Gallo et al. 2004; Dunford et al. 2010).”
The Determinants of Employee Compensation in Family Firms: Empirical Evidence (2007, methodology): “All of these have been used in previous compensation studies (see Gomez-Mejia et al., 2003), as well as in family business studies in which family firms are characterized and significantly differ from other businesses (see Gallo et al., 2004; Galve & Salas, 2003).”
The Impact of Family Involvement on the R&D Intensity of Publicly Traded Firms (2011, background): “A sec ond argument is the family members’ difficulty in mobi lizing the necessary external financial resources for carrying out R&D investments (Gallo et al., 2004).”
Family Involvement in Ownership and Management: Exploring Nonlinear Effects on Performance (2008, background): “Gallo, Tapies, and Cappuyns (2004), in their study of 305 Spanish firms, allowed respondents to judge whether the company was a family or a nonfamily firm: They found that family firms’ leverage and debt ratios were lower than in nonfamily firms and that, on the other hand, the sales/assets ratio…”