Rethinking Rubrics in Writing Assessment
By Maja Wilson, A. Kohn. 2006
92 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cdf54adc5c4165daeed333192e4fc0e7c4669cbd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- Reliability and validity of rubrics for assessment through writing (2010, unknown): “Recently, however, some educators have challenged the collective assumption that simply implementing rubrics increases inter-rater reliability and validity, and the overall accuracy and quality of assessment (Kohn, 2006; Wilson, 2006).”
- Putting Rubrics to the Test: The Effect of a Model, Criteria Generation, and Rubric‐Referenced Self‐Assessment on Elementary School Students' Writing (2008, result): “We also note that the finding regarding the effect of treatment on criteria such as voice, or ideas and content, stands as a rejoinder to recent critiques of rubrics (Kohn, 2006; Wilson, 2006).”
- The Case against Grades. (2011, background): “Conversely, one sometimes finds a mismatch between more thoughtful forms of pedagogy — say, a workshop approach to teaching writing — and a depressingly standardized assessment tool like rubrics (Wilson, 2006).”