Bee foraging in uncertain environments using predictive hebbian learning
By P. R. Montague, Peter S. Dayan, Christophe Person, Terrence J. Sejnowski. 1995
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Andrea Soltoggio
- Karl J. Friston
- J. Urgen Schmidhuber
- Kenneth O. Stanley
- Sergey Levine
- Peter S. Dayan
- Yoshua Bengio
- Yael Niv
Citations in the corpus
- WRITING MEMORIES WITH LIGHT-ADDRESSABLE REINFORCEMENT CIRCUITRY (2009, background): “A variety of neuromorphic circuits for computing such signals have been proposed (Houk et al., 1995; Montague et al., 1995; Schultz et al., 1997; Wörgötter and Porr, 2005), but these remain speculative until actual biological examples are solved.”
- Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction (1998, background): “Montague et al. (1995) pointed out that dopamine likely plays a similar role in the vertebrate brain.”
- Computational Models of Neuromodulation (1998, methodology): “The same approach has been used elsewhere (Montague, Dayan, Person, & Sejnowski, 1995) to show how an identified interneuron in the honeybee brain, VUMmx1, could predict reward values of spatial location during foraging.”
- Dopamine neurons can represent context-dependent prediction error. (2004, unknown): “In the second contextual task, a rewardDominey, 1995; Montague et al., 1995; Nakahara et al.,indicating light stimulus was presented with the prob2001; Suri and Schultz, 1998). ability that, while fixed overall, was incremented as a However, the exact correspondence between DA refunction of the…”
- SPIKING NEURON MODELS Single Neurons , Populations , Plasticity (2002, background): “This term has been termed differential -Hebbian (Roberts, 1999; Xie and Seung, 2000) and plays a certain role in the context of conditioning and reinforcement learning (Montague et al., 1995; Rao and Sejnowski, 2001).”
- Evolutionary and Computational Advantages of Neuromodulated Plasticity (2008, methodology): “Belonging to this category, a study in (Montague et al., 1995) employs a multiplicative modulatory effect similar to that in (Abbott, 1990) to simulate reward-based learning in a foraging bee.”
- Understanding dopamine and reinforcement learning: The dopamine reward prediction error hypothesis (2011, background): “(28, 29) realized that this makes sense from the point of view of a TD class—and in this case, a Bush and Mosteller (23, 24) class—reward prediction error.”
- Actor-critic models of the basal ganglia: new anatomical and computational perspectives (2002, background): “Similar to Montague et al. (1995), the output of the model unit P quite accurately captures the essence of the activity patterns of midbrain dopaminergic neurons in primates and rodents (Montague et al., 1996; Schultz, Dayan, & Montague, 1997), and the corresponding octopaminergic neurons in bees…”
- Surprise signals in anterior cingulate cortex: Neuronal encoding of unsigned reward prediction errors driving adjustment in behavior (2011, background): “Although many previous studies have emphasized the importance of reward prediction errors in associative learning (Montague et al., 1995, 1996; Schultz et al., 1997; Fiorillo et al., 2003; Bayer and Glimcher, 2005; Schultz, 2006; Matsumoto and Hikosaka, 2007, 2009), the absolute value of the reward…”
- Reinforcement Learning or Active Inference? (2009, background): “From a neurobiological perspective [51–56], it may be that dopamine (encoding mc ) does not encode the prediction error of value but the value of prediction error; i.”
- Learning agents for uncertain environments (extended abstract) (1998, background): “There is also neurophysiological evidence that reinforcement learning occurs in bee foraging (Montague et al., 1995) and in songbird vocalization (Doya & Sejnowski, 1995). In this work, it is generally assumed that the reward function is fixed and known. For example, in experiments on bees it is ass”