Computational Models of Neuromodulation
By Jean-Marc Fellous, C. Linster. 1998
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Andrea Soltoggio
- Sebastian Risi
- Kenneth O. Stanley
- Peter Dürr
- Kai Olav Ellefsen
- Dario Floreano
- Jean-Baptiste Mouret
- Paul Tonelli
Citations in the corpus
- Born to Learn: the Inspiration, Progress, and Future of Evolved Plastic Artificial Neural Networks (2017, background): “Neuromodulated plasticity (Fellous and Linster, 1998) is often used to implement reward-learning in neural networks (reviewed later in Section III-F).”
- Evolutionary and Computational Advantages of Neuromodulated Plasticity (2008, methodology): “For a detailed description of the categories mentioned above refer to (Fellous and Linster, 1998).”
- Evolving neuromodulatory topologies for reinforcement learning-like problems (2007, methodology): “Following, an overview of the algorithm is given.”
- Neuromodulation and plasticity in an autonomous robot (2002, background): “During reward conditioning, the model learns to generate tonic and phasic signals that represent predictions and prediction errors, including precisely timed negative signals if expected rewards are omitted or delayed.”
- Better Living Through Chemistry: Evolving GasNets for Robot Control (1998, background): “Of course there are a number of explicit computationalmodelling projects in which the mechanisms and functional role of various kinds of modulation are studied, based on speci c biological data (Fellous and Linster, 1998).”
- Evolution of Reinforcement Learning in Uncertain Environments: A Simple Explanation for Complex Foraging Behaviors (2002, background): “To avoid the possible confusion of terms, we make a distinction between the notions of heterosynaptic learning (Dittman & Regehr, 1997; Schacher, Wu & Sun, 1997; Vogt & Nicoll, 1999) and neuromodulation of plasticity (Bailey, Giustetto, Huang, Hawkins, & Kandel, 2000; Fellous & Linster, 1998).”
- Evolutionary Advantages of Neuromodulated Plasticity in Dynamic, Reward-based Scenarios (2008, background): “Short term memory by means of neuromodulation was investigated in (Ziemke and Thieme, 2002) where a robot navigated in a T-maze and remembered turning directions according to visual clues in the maze.”
- Robot coverage control by evolved neuromodulation (2013, background): “An extensive review of computational models of neuromodulation can be found in [15], and some recent models are reviewed in [23].”
- Neuroevolution: from architectures to learning (2008, background): “The existing evidence points to the combined action of evolved value systems [58] and neuromodulatory effects [2, 18].”
- Neural Plasticity and Minimal Topologies for Reward-Based Learning (2008, background): “(neuromodulation) [4] to reduce the complexity of models and find the minimal required mechanisms.”
- Modeling functions of striatal dopamine modulation in learning and planning. (2001, methodology): “Effects of neuromodulators on neuronal membrane properties have been simulated with various modeling techniques (reviewed in Fellous and Linster, 1998).”
- Evolved Sensitive Periods in Learning (2013, background): “Fellous and Linster (1998) present a review of work on these kinds of networks, revealing that modulatory signals have been used to affect network function in diverse ways, most of them biologically plausible , or at least biologically inspired.”
- Actor-critic models of the basal ganglia: new anatomical and computational perspectives (2002, background): “…plasticity and neuromodulatory gating of synaptic plasticity have been demonstrated in neural tissues (Bailey et al., 2000; Dittman & Regehr, 1997; Fellous & Linster, 1998; Schacher et al., 1997; Vogt & Nicoll, 1999), and have been recognized to increase the computational complexity of synaptic…”