Reinforcement Learning or Active Inference?

By Karl J. Friston, Jean Daunizeau, Stefan J. Kiebel. PLoS ONE, 2009

463 citations recorded by the source corpus.

This paper questions the need for reinforcement learning or control theory when optimising behaviour. We show that it is fairly simple to teach an agent complicated and adaptive behaviours using a free-energy formulation of perception. In this formulation, agents adjust their internal states and sampling of the environment to minimize their free-energy. Such agents learn causal structure in the environment and sample it in an adaptive and self-supervised fashion. This results in behavioural policies that reproduce those optimised by reinforcement learning and dynamic programming. Critically, we do not need to invoke the notion of reward, value or utility. We illustrate these points by solving a benchmark problem in dynamic programming; namely the mountain-car problem, using active perception or inference under the free-energy principle. The ensuing proof-of-concept may be important because the free-energy formulation furnishes a unified account of both action and perception and may speak to a reappraisal of the role of dopamine in the brain.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5e07da2914783a21980ecc1cea688d1333e6b6e4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

  1. Karl J. Friston
  2. Jean Daunizeau
  3. Klaas E. Stephan
  4. Stefan J. Kiebel
  5. James M. Kilner
  6. Nathaniel D. Daw
  7. Martin Brüne
  8. Elliot C. Brown

Citations in the corpus