When `Silence = Death', Keep Talking: Trust, Control and the Discursive Construction of Identity in the Canadian HIV/AIDS Treatment Domain

By S. Maguire, Nelson Phillips, Cynthia Hardy. 2001

184 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Language and Linguistics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cd5345109b246ba4cae46ae2bc015a43eb18d42e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Research, part of a Special Feature on Resilience Through Multi-scalar Collaboration Surmountable Chasms: Networks and Social Innovation for Resilient Systems (2011, background): “This move better positioned the leaders to be perceived as having legitimate authority and therefore to influence how resources were mobilized for policy-making, which, in this case, was crucial for effecting broad system change (Maguire et al. 2001).”
Understanding the Trust-Control Nexus (2005, background): “It can be argued that since at present the relation between trust and control is far from clear (Maguire et al., 2001; Sydow and Windeler, 2003), more theoretical input is needed to fully understand how trust functions as a governance mechanism and how it relates to formal control.”
Trust in Organizational Superiors: Systemic and Collective Considerations (2003, result): “This interpretation is consistent with a recent claim by Maguire et al. (2001) that what some writers (Lewicki and Benedict Bunker 1995) refer to as ‘identity-based trust’ is not very different from norm-based trust, because identities carry with them social meanings, including norms and values.”
Relying on Trust in Cooperative Inter-Organizational Relationships (2006, background): “Maguire, Phillips, and Hardy (2001) also argue that trust and control are closely related and make the case that the type of trust relied upon by parties may be a function of the potential loss of control they are attempting to forestall.”
Institutional entrepreneurship and change in fields (2017, background): “Positions To emphasize that the institutional entrepreneur is as much a product of the field as its architect, researchers have investigated the way in which fields create a limited number of subject positions (Maguire et al., 2001) or social positions (Battilana, 2006) i.”