Multiperiod effects of corporate social responsibility on supply chain networks, transaction costs, emissions, and risk

229 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Optimal Supply Chain Network Design and Redesign at Minimal Total Cost and with Demand Satisfaction (2010, background): “…alternative approach (cf. Nagurney, Dong, and Zhang (2002), Zhang, Dong, and Nagurney (2003), Zhang (2006), Cruz, Nagurney, and Wakolbinger (2006), Cruz and Wakolbinger (2008), Nagurney (2010)) considers competition among decision-makers in supply chains and uses equilibrium (as opposed to…”
A framework for sustainable performance assessment of supply chain management practices (2014, background): “Until now, multi-criteria approaches integrating at least two sustainable dimensions have been rare (Cruz & Wakolbinger, 2008; Sawadogo & Anciaux, 2010; Zhou, Cheng & Hua, 2000), and none have dealt with all three dimensions.”
Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance: Role of Context in International Settings (2013, background): “The data highlights that Australian companies tended to focus on the CSR-Governance intersection in terms of risk mitigation in support of Cruz and Wakolbinger (2008) arguments that heightened CSR reduces risk.”
Decision theory in sustainable supply chain management: a literature review (2014, background): “For instance, Swami and Shah (2012) show optimum results from supply chain co-ordination and co-operation; Cruz and Wakolbinger (2008) compute optimum production outputs, given different levels of investment in CSR; Oglethorpe (2010) seek optimal outcome given different end results desired by…”