The SLUG zinc-finger protein represses E-cadherin in breast cancer.
By K. M. Hajra, David Y. Chen, Eric R. Fearon. Cancer Research, 2002
1,050 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cd39231c21e5a75888fb3690738ef4c0d81f16b4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Simone Brabletz
- Thomas Brabletz
- O. Schmalhofer
- Manel Esteller
- Kirsten Aigner
- Julian Heuberger
- R. Weinberg
- Q. Cao
Citations in the corpus
- Snail Mediates E-Cadherin Repression by the Recruitment of the Sin3A/Histone Deacetylase 1 (HDAC1)/HDAC2 Complex (2004, background): “An additional member of the Snail family, Slug, has also been reported to act as an E-cadherin repressor (10, 22).”
- Epithelial-mesenchymal transition: at the crossroads of development and tumor metastasis. (2008, background): “…transcription, thereby causing the dissolution of cell-cell adhesion that occurs during EMT; these include Slug, a close relative of Snail (Hajra et al., 2002), and two members of the ZEB family of transcription factors, ZEB1 (dEF1) (Eger et al., 2005) and ZEB2 (SIP1) (Comijn et al.,…”
- Interplay of cadherin-mediated cell adhesion and canonical Wnt signaling. (2010, background): “Both Snail and Slug bind to the E-box motive of the E-cadherin promoter through a carboxy-terminal zink-finger domain and suppress the expression of E-cadherin (Batlle et al. 2000; Cano et al. 2000; Hajra et al. 2002; Bolos et al. 2003).”
- Repression of E-cadherin by the polycomb group protein EZH2 in cancer (2008, methodology): “…repression by snail and slug, ubiquitination and degradation of the E-cadherin and lysosomal targeting of the E-cadherin for degradation (Batlle et al., 2000; Fujita et al., 2002; Hajra et al., 2002; Peinado et al., 2004; Saito et al., 2004; Takeno et al., 2004; Palacios et al., 2005).”
- Spatiotemporal regulation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition is essential for squamous cell carcinoma metastasis. (2012, background): “The EMT program is orchestrated through a network of transcription factors, including Twist1 (Yang et al., 2004), Snail1/2 (Batlle et al., 2000; Cano et al., 2000; Hajra et al., 2002), Zeb1/2 (Comijn et al., 2001; Eger et al., 2005), and FOXC2 (Mani et al., 2007).”
- The transcription factor Slug represses E-cadherin expression and induces epithelial to mesenchymal transitions: a comparison with Snail and E47 repressors (2003, result): “These data are also in agreement with a recent report indicating that Slug is a repressor of E-cadherin in breast carcinoma cell lines (Hajra et al., 2002).”
- Epithelial–mesenchymal plasticity in carcinoma metastasis (2013, background): “During EMT, E-cadherin gene transcriptional repression (Batlle et al. 2000; Cano et al. 2000; Hajra et al. 2002), promoter methylation (Graff et al. 1995; Kanai et al. 1997; Saito et al. 1998), and protein phosphorylation and degradation (Zhou et al. 2004; Bachelder et al. 2005; Lester et al. 2007)…”
- Cadherin switching (2008, background): “The expression of E-cadherin is negatively regulated by a number of zinc-finger-family transcription factors, including Snail, Slug, Twist, E12 (E47, TCFE2A), SIP1 (ZEB2) and EF1 (ZEB1), each of which has been reported to bind to the E-cadherin promoter to repress its transcription (Bolos et al., 20”
- Somatic inactivation of E-cadherin and p53 in mice leads to metastatic lobular mammary carcinoma through induction of anoikis resistance and angiogenesis. (2006, background): “…that several transcription repressors of E-cadherin, such as SIP1, Snail, Slug, and Twist (Savagner et al., 1997; Batlle et al., 2000; Cano et al., 2000; Comijn et al., 2001; Hajra et al., 2002; Yang et al., 2004) can induce epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and subsequent metastasis.”
- ISMARA: automated modeling of genomic signals as a democracy of regulatory motifs (2014, unknown): “transcription factors[70] and by ZEB1[71].”