An affirmed self and an open mind: Self-affirmation and sensitivity to argument strength.
By Joshua Correll, S. Spencer, M. Zanna. 2004
256 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cccc85d618c07d70a38aeab5ec700a1a6da07110
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- P. Briñol
- Kirk Warren Brown
- Richard M. Ryan
- A. McQueen
- C. Abraham
- William M. P. Klein
- Jason Reifler
- Lillian Lee
In Social Psychology
- Phillip R. Shaver
- Mario Mikulincer
- Kirk Warren Brown
- J. D. Creswell
- Richard M. Ryan
- D. Sherman
- Geoffrey L. Cohen
- Richard E. Petty
In Sociology and Political Science
- D. Sherman
- P. Briñol
- Richard E. Petty
- Geoffrey L. Cohen
- Phillip R. Shaver
- Mario Mikulincer
- Brendan Nyhan
- Jason Reifler
Citations in the corpus
- Winning Arguments: Interaction Dynamics and Persuasion Strategies in Good-faith Online Discussions (2016, background): “In psychology, self-affirmation has been found to indicate open-mindedness and make beliefs more likely to yield [11, 12].”
- Measuring defensive responses to threatening messages: a meta-analysis of measures (2007, methodology): “Measures of perceived persuasiveness or strength of evidence were also frequently used (Block & Williams, 2002; Cohen et al., 2000, study 2; Correll et al., 2004; Harris & Napper, 2005; Reed & Aspinwall, 1998).”
- Experimental manipulations of self-affirmation: A systematic review (2006, background): “Compared with non-affirmed participants, selfaffirmed participants were more accepting of counter-attitudinal arguments (Cohen et al., 2000; Correll et al., 2004), demonstrated less prejudice (Fein & Spencer, 1997; Zarate & Garza, 2002, study 1), but viewed a non-stigmatized other more…”
- The roles of information deficits and identity threat in the prevalence of misperceptions (2019, background): “…the data by whether respondents selected job creation and economic growth as the most important issue facing the country or not (47% did so) following Correll, Spencer, and Zanna (2004), who find self-affirmation effects were concentrated among those for whom the issue is most important.”
- Self-Affirmation: Understanding the Effects (2013, background): “Second, affirmations lead to greater message scrutiny (Klein et al., 2011; see also Correll et al., 2004), as there is greater openness when affirmed, but only to strong and not to weak health messages.”
- PERSUASION: INSIGHTS FROM THE SELF VALIDATION HYPOTHESIS (2009, result): “These findings on information processing are consistent with those found by Correll et al. (2004) in a study examining the link between being affirmed prior to a message and the subsequent processing of the message.”
- The psychology of change: self-affirmation and social psychological intervention. (2014, background): “Without the self on trial, people are better able to evaluate evidence on its merits (Correll et al. 2004, Klein et al. 2011).”
- Boosting Attachment Security to Promote Mental Health, Prosocial Values, and Inter-Group Tolerance (2007, background): “This is, we believe, why self-affirmation manipulations work in adulthood, especially for people who feel threatened or are low in self-esteem or plagued by attachment anxiety (eg, Correll, Spencer, & Zanna, 2004 ; Spencer, Fein, & Lomore, 2001 ).”