Enterprise resource planning: cultural fits and misfits: is ERP a universal solution?

By Christina Soh, S. Kien, Joanne Tay-Yap. CACM, 2000

1,182 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cc6ad0a61342b2cc746d4c557301860fccb17e06

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

Citations in the corpus

A Multi-Project Model of Key Factors Affecting Organizational Benefits from Enterprise Systems (2010, background): “…Financial Executives International and CSC (2006), Hong and Kim (2002), Keil and Tiwana (2006), Sia and Soh (2002, 2007), Soh and her colleagues (Soh et al. 2000, 2003; Soh and Sia 2005), and Somers and Nelson (2003) have provided evidence that functional fit is a key driver of organizational…”
Assimilation of enterprise systems: the effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management (2007, background): “ERP systems' impacts on organizational processes, structures, and even cultures are much broader and more profound (Robey et al. 2002; Soh et al. 2000) than less complicated technologies.”
ERP software implementation: an integrative framework (2001, methodology): “Several methodologies and approaches for software selection have been proposed by a number of researchers and practitioners (Kuiper, 1998; Butler, 1999; Everdingen et al , 2000; Soh et al , 2000; Ver-ville & Halingten, 2001).”
ERP implementation: a compilation and analysis of critical success factors (2007, background): “Vendors must also explain the embedded data requirements (Soh et al., 2000).”
Implementation Team Responsiveness and User Evaluation of Customer Relationship Management: A Quasi-Experimental Design Study of Social Exchange Theory (2002, background): “This is especially important in the case of ERP systems in general, because these IT need to be customized to specific user needs before they can be used properly [11, 23, 34, 35].”
Firm Performance Effects in Relation to the Implementation and Use of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems (2004, background): “Such factors may include the choice of the ERP vendor, the scope of implementation and extent of business process change, anticipated benefits and justification of ERP implementation based on business rather than technical motives, and, last, change management during the implementation process (Murr”