Today's state‐owned enterprises of China: are they dying dinosaurs or dynamic dynamos?

By David A. Ralston, Jane Terpstra-Tong, R. Terpstra, Xueli Wang, Carolyn P. Egri. 2006

308 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cc415579249532aa33651c8eca1aebf5ce26af1d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Demography

Citations in the corpus

The crossvergence perspective: reflections and projections (2008, background): “The third, fourth, and fifth studies more rigorously define the crossvergence process by investigating the three primary aspects of the business ideology influences, as previously described and as also discussed in our 2006 Management and Organization Review article (Ralston et al., 2006a).”
Theories of the (state-owned) firm (2016, background): “While some have labeled these moves Bpartial privatization^ (Gupta, 2005), fundamentally these firms are still SOEs (Peng, 2000; Ma, Yao, & Xi, 2006; Ralston et al., 2006).”
Competitive position, managerial ties, and profitability of foreign firms in China: an interactive perspective (2009, background): “category ‘‘foreign firms’’ (Ralston et al., 2006).”
Spillovers and competition among foreign and local firms in China (2008, background): “Another important aspect of competition in China is the different resource endowments firms possess (Peng and Luo, 2000; Peng et al., 2004; Ralston et al., 2006).”
An anatomy of state control in the globalization of state-owned enterprises (2015, background): “Before governance reform, a weak home-country institutional environment makes managers behave more like politicians because they are directly appointed and closely watched by state administrators (Chang & Wong, 2004; Ralston et al., 2006).”
State Ownership and Firm Innovation in China: An Integrated View of Institutional and Efficiency Logics (2017, background): “As Ralston et al. (2006) observed, increasingly competitive markets force SOEs to adopt alternative strategies and pursue new initiatives to survive and succeed.”
Corporate social responsibility, the cost of equity capital and ownership structure: An analysis of Chinese listed firms (2015, result): “In contrast to SOEs, Ralston et al. (2006) note that the risk of investing in NSOEs is higher because there is no similar organization that shares the risk.”
State Control and Corporate Governance in Transition Economies: 25 Years on from 1989 (2016, unknown): “Moreover, China started the split-share structural reform in 2006 as a part of its program to transfer state shares in SOEs to private investors (Haveman & Wang, 2013) and to transform the corporate governance model from administrative to more marketoriented (Ralston et al., 2006).”
State-owned Enterprises Around the WORLD as Hybrid Organizations (2015, background): “While the authors of one of the 39 SOE articles we reviewed for this article reported that managers in China perceived SOEs’ performance to be better than that of private firms (Ralston et al., 2006), researchers (particularly in economics) have found that state ownership does not generate superior ”
Corporate Governance in China: A Meta‐Analysis (2018, methodology): “First, the adoption of the modern enterprise systems in the 1990s 9Corporate Governance in China VC 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd and Society for the Advancement of Management Studies 951 facilitated the restructuring of SOEs based on Western management philosophy (Ralston et al., 2006).”
Does the Colour of the Cat Matter? The Red Hat Strategy in China's Private Enterprises (2007, unknown): “There is a growing literature suggesting that public- and private-owned firms differ significantly in their strategies and performance (Ralston et al., 2006).”