An Empirical Review of the Employment Interview Construct Literature

152 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Introducing the construct curiosity for predicting job performance (2013, background): “Second, selection decisions were based on diverse criteria, including interviews, which are known to have low correlations with the study variables (Huffcutt, 2011).”
Hiring as Cultural Matching (2012, background): “Additionally, research is often constrained to easily observable individual-, organizational-, or industry-level information derived from employment records or public data.”
Why your stigma isn't hired : a dual-process framework of interview bias (2016, background): “Recent reviews of the interview literature have highlighted various types of visible stigmas that can influence interviewers' judgments (e.g., Dipboye & Johnson, 2013; Huffcutt, 2011; Macan, 2009; Macan & Merritt, 2011).”