Institutions and the internationalization of US venture capital firms

By Isin Guler, Mauro F. Guillén. 2010

328 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cb9147ca3dad107d8f3645176702ff43f00f995a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Institutional open access at home and outward internationalization (2015, unknown): “…September 27, 2007. http://www.economist.com/finance/PrinterFriendly.cfm?story_id=9861591. distance of financial market openness between EE and DE also helps local firms to access international venture capital (Gu & Lu, 2010; Guler & Guillén, 2010) and to cross-list overseas (Peng & Su, 2014).”
Emerging multinationals from mid-range economies: the influence of institutions and factor markets (2013, background): “Institutions in host countries significantly shape firms’ market entry strategies and modes (Guler and Guillen, 2010; Meyer et al., 2009a).”
Immigrant remittances and the venture investment environment of developing countries (2011, background): “Guler and Guillén (2010) provide recent evidence that such transaction costs deter venture investment activity in many developing countries with less-established formal institutions to coordinate the transfer of money and ideas.”
Effects of inward investment on outward investment: The venture capital industry worldwide 1985–2007 (2011, methodology): “Prior studies have documented the important effects of entrepreneurial opportunities and supporting institutions on foreign VC investment decisions (Gaur & Lu, 2007; Gompers & Lerner, 2000; Guler & Guillén, 2010).”
The liability of foreignness in capital markets: Sources and remedies (2011, unknown): “Indeed, cultural differences and geographical distance can create problems in cross-border VC investments and can diminish the commitment of venture capitalists in foreign markets (Guler & Guillen, 2010; Mäkelä & Maula, 2008).”
Home Country Institutions and the Internationalization-Performance Relationship (2016, background): “The index ranges between 0 (most hazardous) and 1 (most constrained, i.e., stable) and has been extensively used in IB research (e.g., Guler & Guillén, 2010; Lu, 2002).”
Foreign Location Choice: Review and Extensions (2016, unknown): “The main insight that emerges is that ‘firms are heterogeneous in their perception of institutional constraints and opportunities in foreign markets, and in their ability to cope with them’ (Guler and Guillén 2009, p. 186).”
The Location Choice of Foreign Direct Investments: Empirical Evidence and Methodological Challenges (2017, background): “…al. (2005), García and Guilén (2008), Glickman and Woodward (1988), Globerman and Shapiro (2003), Grosse and Trevino (2005), Guimaraes et al. (2000), Guler and Guillén (2010), He (2002), He (2003), Head et al. (1999), Head and Mayer (2004), Henisz and Delios (2001), Henisz and Macher (2004),…”
The contingent value of venture capitalist reputation (2011, background): “This issue is also significant because VCs are not only making investments further from home within the US, they are also expanding internationally (Gompers and Lerner, 2004; Guler and Guillen, 2010).”
National Distances, International Experience, and Venture Capital Investment Performance (2013, unknown): “Through international investments, VCs are able to tap into growth opportunities in foreign markets (Dai et al., 2012; Guler and Guillen, 2010).”
The Strength of Strong Ties in an Emerging Industry: Experimental Evidence of the Effects of Status Hierarchies and Personal Ties in Venture Capitalist Decision Making: The Strength of Strong Ties (2015, unknown): “Investors transfer information through personal ties built through co-investment activity (Guler and Guillén, 2010a), board relationships (Hallen, Katila, and Rosenberger, 2014), and post-investment support for the portfolio firm such as recruiting or structuring the next round of investment…”
International experience and FDI location choices of Chinese firms: The moderating effects of home country government support and host country institutions (2014, background): “In other words, this assumption which focuses on firms’ experiential learning has largely ignored the role of home country factors in internationalization (Guler & Guillén, 2010).”
An institutional approach to cross-national distance (2010, background): “Proximity to knowledge has been argued to influence the location choice of multinational firms (Anand & Kogut, 1997; Berry, 2006; Guler & Guillén, 2010; Nachum et al., 2008; Shaver & Flyer, 2000), because of the potential for spillovers.”
Do cross-border mergers and acquisitions increase short-term market performance? The case of Chinese firms (2017, background): “The host country government can enhance its country’s location advantages by improving its institutions in order to attract foreign firms (Guler & Guillen, 2010; Witt & Lewin, 2007).”