A Web-based interface to calculate phonotactic probability for words and nonwords in English
By Michael S. Vitevitch, Paul A. Luce. Behavoir research methods, instruments & computers, 2004
494 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8f5569fddab86f1e5d8f53b9ed64cb6f233c0556
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Keith Johnson
- Yao Yao
- Susanne Gahl
- Andrea Révész
- Gene P. Ouellette
- Tineke Brunfaut
- M. Sénéchal
- Florent Perek
Citations in the corpus
- TEXT CHARACTERISTICS OF TASK INPUT AND DIFFICULTY IN SECOND LANGUAGE LISTENING COMPREHENSION (2013, methodology): “Likewise, the word-initial biphone sequence /sʌ/ carries higher phonotactic probability or biphone frequency than /ji/ because /sʌ/ is a more frequent word-initial sequence in British English (Vitevitch & Luce, 2004 ).”
- A Window Into Early Literacy: Exploring the Cognitive and Linguistic Underpinnings of Invented Spelling (2008, methodology): “These values were derived from the online calculator described in Vitevitch and Luce (2004).”
- Why reduce? Phonological neighborhood density and phonetic reduction in spontaneous speech (2012, methodology): “Two separate phonotactic probability estimates for each word type were obtained through the web-based phonotactic probability calculator (Vitevitch & Luce, 2004).”