The Effect of Ownership Structure on Corporate Social Responsibility: Empirical Evidence from Korea

By Won‐yong Oh, Young Kyun Chang, Aleksey Martynov. 2011

712 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ca2d775c507184e94e39ce1c9baa208b29987067

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Corporate social responsibility reporting and organizational stigma: the case of "sin" industries. (2016, background): “Firstly, insider ownership is associated with more inward-looking management policies, which quite often exclusively focus on short-term value-maximising activities (Gamerschlag et al. , 2011; Oh et al. , 2011).”
Exploring the Relationship Between Board Characteristics and CSR: Empirical Evidence from Korea (2015, methodology): “Previous studies (e.g., Oh et al. (2011)] found that ownership characteristics also affect CSR.”
Value-Enhancing Capabilities of CSR: A Brief Review of Contemporary Literature (2014, methodology): “Oh et al. (2011) conducted a study using Korean market data, and their results indicate that CSR ratings and institutional ownership are positively associated.”
Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures: Evidence from an Emerging Economy (2012, background): “The ﬁndings of limited prior evidence also document a negative relationship between managerial ownership and the extent of CSR disclosures (Oh et al. 2011 ; Ghazali 2007).”
Tax avoidance, corporate governance, and corporate social responsibility: The case of the Egyptian capital market (2020, background): “…(Prado-Lorenzo et al., 2009). r The western management practices and globalization have affected CSR practices in several regions around the world (Oh et al., 2011). a l Rao & Tilt (2016) highlight the importance of investigating the impact of board composition on CSR activities and reporting. n…”
Complementary or Substitutive Effects? Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Corporate Social Responsibility (2018, result): “In contrast, other studies (e.g., Arora & Dharwadkar, 2011; Oh et al., 2011) found a negative relationship between incentive alignment and CSR.”
Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure in Developed and Developing Countries: A Literature Review (2017, unknown): “…& Magnan, 1999; Chih et al., 2010; Shi et al., 2012), shareholders (Neu et al. , 1998; Toms, 2002; Thorne et al., 2014), creditors (Roberts, 1992; Oh et al., 2011), investors (Wilmshurst & Frost, 2000), environ-mentalists (Deegan & Gordon, 1996; Neu et al., 1998) and the media (Neu et al., 1998;…”
When CEO Career Horizon Problems Matter for Corporate Social Responsibility: The Moderating Roles of Industry-Level Discretion and Blockholder Ownership (2016, background): “slack resources (Waddock and Graves 1997), firm size (Stanwick and Stanwick 1998), board characteristics (Johnson and Greenings 1999), and ownership structures (Barnea and Rubin 2010; Oh et al. 2011).”
A Cross-Country Investigation of Corporate Governance and Corporate Sustainability Disclosure: A Signaling Theory Perspective (2018, unknown): “[1], for example, find a negative and significant relationship for Korean firms because the family-oriented business environment leads to a contradiction between family and stakeholders’ interests.”
Corporate Governance and Executive Compensation for Corporate Social Responsibility (2015, unknown): “…results, finding evidence of negative (Coombs and Gilley, 2005; David et al., 2007), insignificant (Graves and Waddock, 1994; Schnatterly 2003), and positive (Coffey and Fryxell, 1991; Jo and Harjoto, 2011; Oh et al., 2011; Rupley et al., 2012) relationships between corporate governance and CSR.”