Neuroeconomics: The Consilience of Brain and Decision

By Paul Glimcher, Aldo Rustichini. Science, 2004

709 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ca1b3dde6b1f29f7171bd5eb68b7493fc14ec303

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In General Decision Sciences

In Safety Research

Citations in the corpus

Online Trust: State of the Art, New Frontiers, and Research Potential (2009, positive): “…is the use of fMRI to understand trust formation. fMRI has been used to identify the areas of the brain that are activated (increased blood flow) by trust or betrayal and has identified the influence of ceritonin and trusting behavior (see Glimcher and Rustichini 2004; King-Casas et al. 2005).”
The Presence of an Attractive Woman Elevates Testosterone and Physical Risk Taking in Young Men (2010, background): “…and losses required by the skateboarding task is likely to be at least partially facilitated by the functioning of the VMPFC (Bechara et al., 1994; Glimcher & Rustichini, 2004; Hare et al., 2009; Xue et al., 2009), and, as noted, reversal-learning tasks such as the one completed by the…”
Oxytocin shapes the neural circuitry of trust and trust adaptation in humans. (2008, positive): “…research agenda (Camerer et al., 2005; Cohen and Blum, 2002; De Quervain et al., 2004; Delgado et al., 2004; Fehr and Camerer, 2007; Glimcher, 2002; Glimcher and Rustichini, 2004; Hsu et al., 2005; King-Casas et al., 2005; Knoch et al., 2006; Knutson et al., 2007; Kuhnen and Knutson, 2005;…”
Orbitofrontal Cortex Encodes Willingness to Pay in Everyday Economic Transactions (2007, background): “This makes understanding how and where the brain makes these computations one of the most important open questions in the nascent field of neuroeconomics (Glimcher and Rustichini, 2004; Camerer et al., 2005).”
Affective Neuroscience: Past, Present, and Future (2009, background): “…likely to feature significantly on the future research agenda; for example, the interplay of affective neuroscience and social psychology—so-called social affective neuroscience (Ochsner & Lieberman, 2001)—and the dialogue between affective neuroscience and economics (Glimcher & Rustichini, 2004).”
Bayesian Spiking Neurons I: Inference (2008, methodology): “It is compatible with some neurophysiological data, since firing rates in the lateral parietal areas have been reported to be proportional to the log probability ratio for appropriate eye movement responses (Mazurek et al., 2003) or probability of reward ( Glimcher & Rustichini, 2004; Sugrue, Corra”
Neuroeconomics: cross-currents in research on decision-making. (2006, background): “A very recent approach, popularly known as neuroeconomics, has sought to integrate ideas from the fields of psychology, neuroscience and economics in an effort to specify more accurate models of choice and decision (for reviews from the perspective of economics, see [ 1 ,2]).”
What Does the Brain Tell Us About Trust and Distrust? Evidence from a Functional Neuroimaging Study (2010, methodology): “While virtually all human processes are controlled by the brain, cognitive neuroscience is interested in cognitive, emotional, and social processes (Glimcher and Rustichini 2004).”
The neural systems that mediate human perceptual decision making (2008, background): “Beyond that, they will help us to understand whether the principles discussed here also hold for more complex decisions that are based on reward outcome, namely economic decision”
Applications of functional magnetic resonance imaging for market research (2007, background): “In the marketing literature, an overview is clearly needed, just as other researchers have provided in the economic literature (Camerer et al., 2004; Glimcher and Rustichini, 2004; Zak, 2004; Fehr and Singer, 2005; Kenning and Plassmann, 2005).”
Evidence for a Common Representation of Decision Values for Dissimilar Goods in Human Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex (2009, background): “This leads to a fundamental question in decision neuroscience: How is the brain capable of making a choice between different types of rewards? A long-held view in economics, which has also recently been proposed in decision neuroscience and neuroeconomics, is that the brain solves this problem by as”