Neuroeconomics: cross-currents in research on decision-making.

By Alan G. Sanfey, George Loewenstein, Samuel M. McClure, J. Cohen. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2006

562 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/474b47b747f972192dbea9c068ac1a886f20ee27

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Economics and Econometrics

In General Decision Sciences

Citations in the corpus

Time Discounting for Primary Rewards (2007, background): “Such distinctions have also begun to receive support from neuroscientific evidence (Sanfey et al., 2006).”
The effect of emotion and time pressure on risk decision-making (2015, methodology): “One commonly accepted cognitive model, the subjective expected utility model, raised by Sanfey (2007), addressed a formula by which the expected utility of each potential outcome is computed as the product of the probability and subjective value (Sanfey et al. 2006; Sanfey 2007).”
Processing of social and monetary rewards in the human striatum. (2008, background): “The decision-making process has recently attracted the attention of researchers from various disciplines, and considerable progress has been made in understanding its neural basis (Daw and Doya, 2006; Montague et al., 2006; Sanfey et al., 2006).”
The neuroscience of social decision-making. (2011, unknown): “Finally, as with individual decisions , challenging social decisions can involve conflict between emotion and reason (Frith & Singer 2008, Sanfey et al. 2006).”
The neural basis of decision making. (2007, background): “Decisions that are based primarily on the subjective value associated with each of the possible alternatives are the focus of the nascent field of neuroeconomics (for reviews see Glimcher 2005, Sanfey et al. 2006, Sugrue et al. 2005).”
Functional magnetic resonance imaging in consumer research: A review and application (2011, background): “Social sciences such as psychology, sociology, and anthropology all contribute to the prediction and explanation of the measured phenomena (Braeutigam, 2005; Sanfey et al., 2006).”
On the Use of Neuropyhsiological Tools in IS Research: Developing a Research Agenda for NeuroIS (2012, background): “The cognitive neuroscience literature also focused on calculative and emotional decision-making under different conditions (Sanfey et al. 2006), such as balancing rewards and risks (e.g., McClure et al. 2004a), managing uncertainty, risk, and ambiguity (e.g., Huettel et al. 2005; Krain et al.…”