Design, Evaluation, and Analysis of Questionnaires for Survey Research

By Willem E. Saris, I. Gallhofer. 2007

732 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Sociology and Political Science, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ca11e49e3653cc6e76e9abf0782c232e15337500

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Sociology and Political Science

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

Refining the theory of basic individual values. (2012, methodology): “The IoQ corresponds to the correlation between the observed variables and the latent variable (Saris & Gallhofer, 2007).”
A comparison of the invariance properties of the PVQ-40 and the PVQ-21 to measure human values across German and Polish Samples (2012, methodology): “First, one may compute a simple average index out of the reported values and in the next step compute the so-called ‘simple means’ (Coromina, Saris and Oberski 2009:13; Saris and Gallhofer 2007:340-41).”
The scales of general well-being (SGWB) (2017, methodology): “Within each page, item order was randomized to minimize the effect of question order (De Vaus, 2002; Saris & Gallhofer, 2014).”
Do we have to combine Values in the Schwartz' Human Values Scale? A Comment on the Davidov Studies (2009, background): “Is it true that these values are inseparable or is this a problem of the specific PVQ version used in the ESS? A closer look at the face validity of the items for the problematic values aids in further understanding the problem (Saris and Gallhofer, 2007).”
Can we Rate Public Support for Democracy in a Comparable Way? Cross-National Equivalence of Democratic Attitudes in the World Value Survey (2011, background): “…multiple indicator scales allow controlling for random and non-random measurement errors and test for the convergent and discriminate validity of the scale, as well as testing for cross-cultural invariance of meaning and scale use (Billiet 2003; Bollen 1989; Brown 2006; Saris and Gallhofer 2007).”
Measurement Error Models With Uncertainty About the Error Variance (2013, methodology): “Saris and Gallhofer (2007) discussed an analysis of the reciprocal effect between social and political trust with correction for measurement error.”
A cross-country and cross-time comparison of the human values measurements with the second round of the European Social Survey (2008, unknown): “For example, De Beuckelaer (2005) and De Jong, Steenkamp and Fox (2007) discuss the item response theory (IRT) approach, and Saris and Gallhofer (2007) show how to test for cognitive equivalence.”
Applied Psychometrics: The Steps of Scale Development and Standardization Process (2018, background): “Just as the form of the question can influence the response, so can the form of the response scale (Barker et al., 2016; Saris & Gallhofer, 2007; Schwartz, 1999).”
Testing for comparability of human values across countries and time with the third round of the European Social Survey (2010, methodology): “Saris and Gallhofer (2007) suggest that the invariance test in this study is too restrictive and provide an alternative test using ESS data (for applications see e.g. Knoppen and Saris, 2007).”
The challenge of understanding decisions in experimental studies of common pool resource governance (2011, methodology): “Survey data are commonly used in social science research, the methodology is vigorously discussed (e.g., Hutchinson, 2004), and there is now a large literature regarding how to design and test questionnaires (e.g. Saris and Gallhofer, 2007; Sudman et al., 2004).”