Testing for comparability of human values across countries and time with the third round of the European Social Survey

116 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE OF A REFINED VALUES SCALE 1 Running Head : MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE OF A REFINED VALUES SCALE The Cross-National Invariance Properties of a New Scale to Measure 19 Basic Human Values . A Test across Eight Countries (2014, methodology): “Several studies with the PVQ-21 have revealed severe violations of crosscountry measurement invariance (e.g., Davidov, 2008; Davidov, 2010; Davidov, Schmidt, & Schwartz, 2008).”
Testing the discriminant validity of Schwartz’ Portrait Value Questionnaire items – A replication and extension of Knoppen and Saris (2009) (2012, methodology): “Studies using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on data of the ESS short scale have not supported the full Schwartz model of human values (e.g., Davidov 2008, 2010).”
Testing for Approximate Measurement Invariance of Human Values in the European Social Survey (2018, background): “Davidov et al. (2008) showed that it is necessary to unify some pairs of adjacent values (power with achievement, benevolence with universalism, conformity with tradition). Unifying pairs of neighboring values does not contradict the main assumption of the theory, which postulates that the continuum”
A comparison of the invariance properties of the PVQ-40 and the PVQ-21 to measure human values across German and Polish Samples (2012, methodology): “A shortened version (21 items) of Schwartz’s measurement instrument has been included in the semiannual European Social Survey (ESS) since 2002.”