Do we have to combine Values in the Schwartz' Human Values Scale? A Comment on the Davidov Studies

90 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Testing the discriminant validity of Schwartz’ Portrait Value Questionnaire items – A replication and extension of Knoppen and Saris (2009) (2012, methodology): “Finally, we compared the outcomes of our analysis with those reported by Knoppen and Saris (2009b).”
MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE OF A REFINED VALUES SCALE 1 Running Head : MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE OF A REFINED VALUES SCALE The Cross-National Invariance Properties of a New Scale to Measure 19 Basic Human Values . A Test across Eight Countries (2014, background): “Knoppen and Saris (2009) challenged the idea of unifying adjacent values.”
Can we Rate Public Support for Democracy in a Comparable Way? Cross-National Equivalence of Democratic Attitudes in the World Value Survey (2011, background): “…projects like the WVS are an important source for analyzing mass attitudes toward democracy, overlooking the issue of measurement problems in general and measurement invariance in particular might cast doubt on theoretical implications that are based on invalid measurement (Knoppen and Saris 2009).”
Testing for comparability of human values across countries and time with the third round of the European Social Survey (2010, background): “Knoppen and Saris (2009) suggest another reason: the ESS value measurements do not possess discriminant validity (Campbell and Fiske, 1959).”