Refining the theory of basic individual values.

By Shalom H. Schwartz, Jan Cieciuch, Michele Vecchione, Eldad Davidov, Ronald Fischer, Constanze Beierlein, A. Ramos, M. Verkasalo, Jan-Erik Lönnqvist, Kursad Demirutku and 2 more. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2012

2,346 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b3789257600b4dfe24fdcc9895629705e84ba8d7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Value tradeoffs propel and inhibit behavior: Validating the 19 refined values in four countries (2017, methodology): “Our findings, based on somewhat different measures, reinforce the conclusion that this is the appropriate order of the values in the refined theory, rather than the order that Schwartz et al. (2012) initially hypothesized.”
Consumer Power: Evolution in the Digital Age (2013, background): “Researchers agree that power is a key human concern (Schwartz et al. 2012) that constantly influences behavior and constitutes a “fundamental component of social systems and hierarchies” (Rucker, Galinsky, and Dubois 2011, p 353; cf. Russel 1938).”
Testing a New Theoretical Model for Attitudes Toward Immigrants (2016, methodology): “The personal value preferences of the social workers were measured using the latest version of the Portrait Values Questionnaire (PVQ-R; Schwartz et al., 2012).”
Personal values and prosocial behaviour in strategic interactions: Distinguishing value‐expressive from value‐ambivalent behaviours (2013, methodology): “Study 2 also adds to the results of Study 1 in the sense that we now employed the recently developed PVQ5X Value Survey (Schwartz et al., 2012).”
Individual values and delinquency: on considering universals in the content and structure of values (2016, background): “Today, it is above all Schwartz’s (1992; Schwartz et al., 2012) theory of universals in the content and structure of values (TUV) which stimulates psychological as well as interdisciplinary research on individual values (Knafo, Roccas, & Sagiv, 2011).”
Serving followers and family? A trickle-down model of how servant leadership shapes employee work performance (2019, background): “considered universal, socially focused values (Schwartz et al., 2012), different cultural contexts may emphasize such values more so than others.”
A Repository of Schwartz Value Scales with Instructions and an Introduction (2021, positive): “For in depth presentations of the basic theory of values and of literature based on it, I recommend the following publications: Schwartz (1992), Schwartz et al. (2012), Schwartz (2016), and Sagiv and Schwartz (2022).”
Moralized Leadership: The Construction and Consequences of Ethical Leader Perceptions (2015, background): “In tandem with research documenting divergent constructions of morality across cultural backgrounds (Schwartz et al., 2012), political orientations (Iyer et al.”