Meet me halfway: research joint ventures and absorptive capacity

By M. Kamien, I. Zang. 2000

465 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Finance

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c9006596fbba826e77b494b31f12c0ca413e2d0c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Finance

Citations in the corpus

Complementarity in the Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D, External Technology Acquisition, and Cooperation in R&D (2002, background): “The notion of ‘absorptive capacity’ introduced by Cohen & Levinthal (1989) and further developed by a.o. Kamien & Zang (2000), stresses the importance of a stock of prior knowledge to effectively absorb external know-how.”
R&D Cooperation and Spillovers: Some Empirical Evidence from Belgium (2002, unknown): “Furthermore, as generic research diffuses more easily, firms that find sources of basic R&D more important for their innovation process, relative to information sources of applied R&D, are more likely to benefit from incoming spillovers (Kamien and Zang, 2000).”
R&D and technology spillovers via FDI: Innovation and absorptive capacity (2000, unknown): “[19] Kamien, M.”
Managing external knowledge flows: The moderating role of absorptive capacity (2009, background): “Recently, some authors have incorporated the important role of absorptive capacity as a necessary condition for benefiting from the spillovers (Kamien and Zang, 2000).”
When Do Research Consortia Work Well and Why? Evidence from Japanese Panel Data (2002, background): “…government publications, and is as close as possible to an exhaustive list of all the government-sponsored R&D consortia in Japan during that time period.6 In general, Japanese R&D consortia involved some government subsidization of consortia R&D expenditures, lowering the effective cost of R&D.”
What do we know about geographical knowledge spillovers and regional growth?: A survey of the literature (2006, background): “In addition to these results, KAMIEN and ZANG (2000) demonstrate that explicit cooperation is necessary to realize spillovers if the firms decide about not only the quantity of R&D expenditure, but also their qualitative R&D approach.”
Explanatory factors for participation in formal standardisation processes: Empirical evidence at firm level (2006, background): “Regarding the importance of absorptive capacity in traditional research joint ventures see Kamien and Zang (2000).”
Endogenous R&D spillovers and locational choice (2005, methodology): “Using the terminology in Kamien and Zang (2000), both firms locating at the market endpoints would correspond to the choice of a firm-specific research approach, while sharing the same location would be tantamount to the choice of a non-specific research approach.”
An empirical test of models explaining research expenditures and research cooperation: evidence for the German service sector (2002, unknown): “The construction of the empirical counterpart of the ‘generality of the R&D approach’ (Kamien and Zang, 2000) is based on the assumption that the more general a firm’s research approach is, the more heterogeneous its information sources are.”
Internal and External R&D: A Sample Selection Approach (2004, background): “Such a result also holds both when spillovers are endogenized (Poyago-Theotoky, 1999; Kamien and Zang, 2000) and when asymmetric spillovers occur (Amir and Wooders, 1999).”
Spillovers, Appropriability, and R&D (2002, background): “15 See Katsoulacos and Ulph (1998), Cassiman and Veugelers (1998).”