Internal and External R&D: A Sample Selection Approach

By Claudio A. Piga, M. Vivarelli. 2004

200 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d19b50598d8a28d66dbfe604468948d0c954bc9d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

R&D and productivity: testing sectoral peculiarities using micro data (2009, methodology): “Rincon and Vecchi (2003) also used a Cobb–Douglas framework in dealing with micro-data extracted from the Compustat database over the time period 1991–2001.”
Internal capabilities, network resources and appropriation mechanisms as determinants of R&D outsourcing (2015, background): “…as competitors, firms connected by supplier–customer relations, and public research organisations such as universities and public research centres (Piga and Vivarelli, 2004; Nieto and Santamaría, 2007; Holcomb and Hitt, 2007) and tend to become increasingly international (Narula, 2001; OECD,…”
Succeeding in innovation: key insights on the role of R&D and technological acquisition drawn from company data (2014, unknown): “…PROC∗i > 0, 0 otherwise, (1) where PROD∗i and PROC∗i are the latent variables underlying the two binary outcomes we observe and also influencing each other; X ′i summarises a set of exogenous explanatory factors other than innovative expenditures, including companies’ characteristics and sectoral…”
Open service innovation and the firm's search for external knowledge (2014, background): “The more complex the innovation, and the higher the degree of technology intensity, the more likely that firms will seek external knowledge (Bayona, Garcia-Marco & Huerta, 2001; Piga & Vivarelli, 2004; Tether, 2002).”
The Productivity Effects of Internal and External R&D: Evidence From a Dynamic Panel Data Model (2008, unknown): “…second-order polynomial in R&D investment.5 If the depreciation rate of the knowledge stock is small6 we can write: 4Klette (1996), for instance, shows that the empirically observed persistent productivity differences between firms require a model specification that allows for gradual convergence.”
In search of complementary assets: The determinants of alliance formation of high-tech start-ups (2006, background): “and technological competencies of firms (Colombo and Garrone, 1996, 1998; Veugelers, 1997; Khanna et al., 1998, 2000; Piga and Vivarelli, 2004), their “absorptive capacity” (Cohen and Levinthal, 1990), and the cognitive distance between them (Nooteboom, 1992, 1999), which creates both opportunity fo”
Technological Collaboration: Bridging the Innovation Gap between Small and Large Firms** (2010, unknown): “problems (Piga and Vivarelli 2004), which arise from the endogenous decision not to introduce”
International Knowledge Diffusion and Home‐bias Effect: Do USPTO and EPO Patent Citations Tell the Same Story?* (2010, unknown): “…flows and push empirical research to inquire more in depth into the processes of knowledge accumulation and decay and the different channels along which ideas may be transferred (Grossman and Helpman, 1991; Rivera-Batiz and Romer, 1991; Griffith et al., 2003 and 2004; Piga and Vivarelli, 2004).”