R&D Cooperation and Spillovers: Some Empirical Evidence from Belgium

By Bruno Cassiman, Reinhilde Veugelers. 2002

578 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/71eb6538619b43d9db3657c71078fef7a20cd414

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Is Demand-Pulled Innovation Equally Important in Different Groups of Firms? (2007, unknown): “…fixed effects (such as ownership structure, group belonging, managerial capabilities, financial leverage and so on) that can influence a firm's incentive to engage in R&D investment and which may explain why only some firms are innovative (see Veugelers, 1997; Cassiman and Veugelers, 2002).”
Keep searching and you’ll find: what do we know about variety creation through firms’ search activities for innovation? (2012, background): “…of innovations, they also use the innovations of leading competing organizations as inputs to their own innovation processes through various forms of imitation mediated by industrial intelligence activities (Mansfield et al., 1981; Levin et al., 1987; Cassiman and Veugelers, 2002; Ziedonis, 2004).”
Concubinage or Marriage? Informal and Formal Cooperations for Innovation (2005, methodology): “In the questionnaire firms rated the importance of (1) customers, (2) suppliers of intermediate inputs and (3) suppliers of equipment on a 5-point scale.”
Research and Development, Cash Flow, Agency and Governance: UK large companies (2012, background): “The GMM1 estimations augment the usual instrument set of lagged endogenous variables with industry averages for the endogenous variable CG to capture industry heterogeneity that may infleunce the firm CG observations (Cassiman and Veugelers 2002)”
Internal and External R&D: A Sample Selection Approach (2004, methodology): “(2000) and Cassiman and Veugelers (2002a) by adopting a two-stage, instrumental variable approach where the endogenous variable is replaced in the second stage by its fitted value from a first-stage regression.”
Ready to Be Open? Explaining the Firm-Level Barriers to Benefiting from Openness to External Knowledge (2017, unknown): “Many academic articles using versions of CIS databases have now been published (e.g. Battisti and Stoneman, 2010; Cassiman and Veugelers, 2002; Frenz and Ietto-Gillies, 2009; Laursen and Salter, 2006).”
Succeeding in innovation: key insights on the role of R&D and technological acquisition drawn from company data (2014, unknown): “Similarly, several papers discuss the importance of cooperation agreements—either between companies or with universities and public labs—for the promotion of innovative activity (Jaffe 1989; Cassiman and Veugelers 2002; Piga and Vivarelli 2004).”
The dynamics of interfirm networks along the industry life cycle: The case of the global video game industry, 1987–2007 (2013, background): “In addition to these proximity dimensions, the literature has argued that individual characteristics of organizations may also influence the likelihood to collaborate (Cassiman and Veugelers, 2002).”
A Functional Perspective on Learning and Innovation: Investigating the Organization of Absorptive Capacity (2011, unknown): “Cassiman and Veugelers, 2002 , 2006 ; Mairesse and Mohnen, 2002 ; Rouvinen, 2002 ; Veugelers and Cassiman, 2005 ; Laursen and Salter, 2006 ; Reichstein and Salter, 2006 ).”
Corporate Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Role of Intangible Resources (2010, unknown): “The second approach, which we have followed, consists of introducing the averaged dependent variable (excluding the focal firm) as an explanatory variable (Cassiman and Veugelers, 2002).”
Open innovation practices in SMEs and large enterprises (2012, unknown): “Company innovation strategies have recently been characterised by a trend towards more openness, with companies increasingly relying on outside information (Laursen and Salter 2006) and research collaborations (Cassiman and Veugelers 2002) to develop new products, services and processes.”
Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies (2004, background): “More recent IO models take into account that firms can attempt to manage spillovers, trying to minimize outgoing spillovers while at the same time maximizing the incoming spillovers (Cassiman et al. 2002; Martin 1999, Amir et al 2003).”
Making sense of innovation by R&D and non-R&D innovators in low technology contexts: a forgotten lesson for policymakers (2011, result): “(2009) and Laursen and Salter (2006) a clear substitution effect, instead of the complementary effect claimed by Cassiman and Veugelers (2006). These results also have two different interpretations in this study.”
Public R&D Policies and Private R&D Investment: A Survey of the Empirical Evidence (2015, background): “Developing in more detail the importance of distinguishing between incoming and outgoing spillover measures for a firm’s R&D cooperation decisions also ought to be part of the future research agenda, as emphasised in Cassiman and Veugelers (2002).”
Appropriability, Preemption, and Firm Performance (2009, unknown): “Only more recently have researchers begun to consider the impact of asymmetric , firm-specific appropriability and analyze its implications for firm and industry innovation incentives and performance (Amir and Wooders, 1999; Cassiman and Veugelers, 2002; Ceccagnoli, 2005).”