Explaining female and male entrepreneurship at the country level

By I. Verheul, André van Stel, Roy Thurik. 2005

619 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c8f3b9c8717c674b2bbcf46b035fe85d024b5eaa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

The Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (Gem) and Its Impact on Entrepreneurship Research (2013, background): “Wennekers et al. (2005) provide evidence of a U-shaped association between economic development and national levels of nascent entrepreneurship.”
Gender factors and female entrepreneurship: International evidence and policy implications (2010, background): “…to our economic environment, studies focused on developed countries found positive relationship between per capita income and selfemployment (Storey 1999; Carree et al. 2002), while another study, combining 29 developed and developing countries, found a U-shaped relationship (Verheul et al. 2006).”
Comparative International Entrepreneurship (2016, background): “Pure economic indicators research has been conducted in the past 5 years, generating disconnected findings from the 5 studies in part due to the diversity of measures of entrepreneurial and economic activity; for example, gDP per capita is negatively associated with necessity-motivated entrepreneurs”
Constraints faced by women entrepreneurs in developing countries: review and ranking (2018, background): “Women entrepreneurship is especially challenging in developing countries because such women lack opportunities, are resource-constrained and face unique challenges (Panda and Dash, 2014, 2016; Verheul et al., 2006).”
Women entrepreneurship in the Middle East and North Africa (2018, background): “Push factors are the result of the dissatisfaction of individuals with their current situation (Verheul et al., 2006).”
Size matters: entrepreneurial entry and government (2012, background): “Most research indicates that men have a higher probability of becoming entrepreneurs than women (Minniti et al. 2005a; Verheul et al. 2006; Reynolds et al. 2002).”
Political Reservations and Women's Entrepreneurship in India (2013, neutral): “4 Examples include Mammen and Paxson (2000), Dhaliwal (2000), Mitra (2002), Ghosh and Cheruvalath (2007), Amin (2010), Field et al. (2010), Pillania et al. (2010), Jensen (2010), Verheul et al. (2006), Bruhn (2009), Munshi (2011), Kobeissi (2010), and World Bank (2008).”
Motivational factors in a push‐pull theory of entrepreneurship (2009, background): “Family-related motivations for becoming an entrepreneur are often labelled push factors and have been recently described as important to entrepreneurs of both genders around the world (Verheul et al., 2006).”
Gender differences in entrepreneurship: Equality, diversity and inclusion in times of global crisis (2010, methodology): “Verheul et al. (2006), using GEM data, investigated the impact of several factors on female and male entrepreneurship at the country level.”
The relationship between economic development and business ownership revisited (2007, background): “However, these low levels may also go together with a limited amount of market opportunities and a lack of personal wealth needed to set up shop (Verheul et al. 2006).”
Gender Gap in Entrepreneurship (2008, neutral): “For example, some authors (Verheul et al., 2006) assign such factor as industrial sector and especially service sector to the factors that decrease the gender gap, while others maintain (Mirchandani, 1999) that there is little analysis of how gendered processes may in fact shape the size of firms,…”
Entrepreneurship and SME growth: evidence from advanced and laggard transition economies (2011, result): “) may have resulted in specific entrepreneurial aspirations which were different from those in developed market economies (Earle and Sakova, 2000; Smallbone and Welter, 2001a, b; Grilo and Thurik, 2006; Verheul et al., 2006; Krasniqi, 2009).”