Size matters: entrepreneurial entry and government

By R. Aidis, Saul Estrin, Tomasz Mickiewicz. Social Science Research Network, 2012

442 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Information Systems, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ae3573f1bd5fc66bc1f69d36cbd6c68e6cdf8006

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Information Systems

In Management of Technology and Innovation

Citations in the corpus

Informal Institutions and Their Comparative Influences on Social and Commercial Entrepreneurship: The Role of In‐Group Collectivism and Interpersonal Trust (2016, methodology): “We control for this factor by using the GDP per capita (expressed as USD) (Aidis, Estrin, and Mickiewicz 2012; Autio and Acs 2010) obtained from the World Bank (WB) data base for 2009.”
Institutions and social entrepreneurship: The role of institutional voids, institutional support, and institutional configurations (2014, methodology): “First, whereas larger government may even deter commercial entrepreneurship (CE) (Aidis et al., 2012), it may benefit social entrepreneurs who often depend directly or indirectly on government support to carry out their missions.”
The Prevalence and Determinants of Social Entrepreneurship at the Macro Level (2016, background): “Aidis, Estrin, and Mickiewicz (2012) find a positive effect of rule of law when low-income countries and middle-income economies are included in their sample.”
Institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth in Europe (2018, methodology): “…that use GEM data Institutional dimension Type of entrepreneurship Authors Regulative Size of government (Opportunity) TEA Bjørnskov and Foss (2008) Aidis et al. (2012) Regulatory burdens TEA De Clercq et al. (2010) Ambitious TEA Levie and Autio (2011) Opportunity TEA Ho and Wong (2007) Labor…”
Entrepreneurs and innovation: The contingent role of institutional factors (2018, methodology): “Lower taxes will allow the pursuit of market opportunities with higher margins; the public sector will be smaller leaving more room for private initiatives (Aidis et al., 2012; Dau and Cuerzo-Cazurra, 2014).”
The Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (Gem) and Its Impact on Entrepreneurship Research (2013, background): “ambitious entrepreneurship (Bowen & De Clercq, 2008; Aidis et al. 2010).”
Subsidies, rent seeking and performance: being young, small or private in China (2016, background): “While these two aspects of government may be correlated as argued by Hayek (1960), they remain different (Aidis et al., 2012).”
Which Institutions Encourage Entrepreneurial Growth Aspirations (2013, methodology): “Importantly, lack of security of property rights and government size are not highly correlated empirically (see Table 2); consistent with Aidis et al. (2012), we have found support for the idea developed in our conceptual framework that they cannot be compressed into a single institutional…”
The Influence of Gender on Entrepreneurial Intention: The Mediating Role of Perceptual Factors (2016, background): “Regarding age, previous literature is not entirely conclusive (Aidis et al., 2012; Levesque and Minniti, 2006).”
Twenty-five years of research on institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: what has been learned? (2019, methodology): “8 For example, Aidis et al. (2008), Estrin and Mickiewicz (2012), Field et al. (2010), Levie and Autio (2008), Meek et al. (2010), Stephan et al. (2015), van Hemmen et al. (2015), among others.”
Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: establishing the framework conditions (2016, unknown): “Entrepreneurs are discouraged from starting up a new business if they are constrained by bureaucracy, numerous local regulations and procedures and time requirements (McMullen, Bagby and Palich 2008) as well as the large government size (Aidis et al. 2012).”
Beyond Red Tape and Fools: Institutional Theory in Entrepreneurship Research, 1992–2014 (2017, methodology): “…control of corruption, regional deregulation, legal system, and economic policies, as well as tax and bankruptcy laws, can strongly influence individuals’ entrepreneurial decision and entrepreneurial activity in a region (Aidis et al., 2012; Anokhin & Schulze, 2009; Lim et al., 2010; Zhou, 2011).”