Food regimes and the production of value: Some methodological issues

By Farshad A. Araghi. 2003

162 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c8ca8e8b5d756f378c001fdd131807209bdeeb55

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

A food regime genealogy (2009, unknown): “It is also complemented by commodity chain analyses,3 dependency analyses,4 and fair trade studies5 that focus on particular food relationships in international trade.”
The Long Green Revolution (2013, background): “Peasants, even the Iranians who become components ‘of the global food regime and of capital and the world historical value relations of the late nineteenth century’ (Araghi 2003, 57), have resisted and continue to resist the great enclosure (Holt Giménez and Shattuck 2011).”
Agrarian political economy and modern world capitalism: the contributions of food regime analysis (2016, background): “…political economy of capitalist development, namely the price of staple foods and its effect for wage levels, the costs of reproduction of labour power, and the expenditure of variable capital and its effects for accumulation (see, inter alios, recent analyses by Araghi 2003; Moore 2010a, 2010b).”
Poverty chains and global capitalism (2018, background): “By contrast, it argues, complementing Araghi (2003), that the provision of a mass of very cheap wage goods produced under conditions of super-exploitation in the global south facilitates intensified wage repression and exploitation (including super-exploitation), across the global north (Selwyn: 201”
The Tuna 'Commodity Frontier': Business Strategies and Environment in the Industrial Tuna Fisheries of the Western Indian Ocean (2012, background): “7 In other words, his perspective ‘is not one of a “social” process and its “environmental” consequences, but rather a dialectic of two bundles of human and extra-human nature’ (Moore 2012, 2; see also Araghi 2003, 2009; Harribey 2008).”
Breaking new ground in food regime theory: corporate environmentalism, ecological feedbacks and the ‘food from somewhere’ regime? (2009, background): “This section will examine a dynamic that others have described, with some concern, as the ‘cultural turn’ in food regimes analysis ( Araghi 2003 ).”
The long hangover from the second food regime: a world-historical interpretation of the collapse of the WTO Doha Round (2009, background): “As numerous previous analysts have recounted, the food regime concept brought together insights from regulation theory and world-systems theory, and applied these to the politics of food ( Araghi 2003; Fold and Pritchard 2005; Friedmann 1993, 1994 ;L e Heron 1993; Le Heron and Roche 1995; McMichael”
Food as Commons or Commodity? Exploring the Links between Normative Valuations and Agency in Food Transition (2017, background): “Food as a pure commodity can be speculated on by investors —speculation on food commodity futures represents the most extreme effect of the commodification of food [10] with no recognition of its dimension as an essential element of life—modified genetically and patented by corporations, or diverted”
Food and Globalization (2006, background): “Researchers have noted concerns about the inability of a food regime approach to explain the diverse and specific circumstances of food production in local-national-global relations (Araghi 2003, Goodman & Dupuis 2002, Goodman & Watts 1997, Moran et al. 1996).”
The neoliberal food regime in Latin America: state, agribusiness transnational corporations and biotechnology (2012, background): “In the FAO’s calculation, 20 million to 30 million peasants were displaced by new policies and technologies in the 1990s (Araghi 2003).”
The new enclosures: critical perspectives on corporate land deals (2012, background): “Food and other agro-commodity regimes5 are political regimes of global value relations (Araghi 2003), which take on particular forms in different eras.”