Intellectual Property Rights in the Global Economy

By S. Lowry. 2001

395 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c87268260c347bbb102938dd0013abb1414bd639

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Junjie Hong
2. Yi Tang
3. Jie Wu
4. Panagiotis Piperopoulos
5. Chengqi Wang
6. W. Park
7. Keith E. Maskus
8. Jiatao Li

Citations in the corpus

• International patent protection: 1960-2005 (2008, background): “A comprehensive review of he literature and analyses of IPR policy can be found in Maskus (2000), andes and Posner (2003), and Scotchmer (2004).”
• Institutions and the internationalization of US venture capital firms (2010, unknown): “Second, differences in patent laws limit the comparability of such figures across countries (Maskus, 2000).”
• Internationalization and innovation performance of emerging market enterprises: The role of host-country institutional development (2016, background): “Laws on intellectual property rights (IPR) protection, fr example, prohibit non-rights holders from using proprietary knowledge and thus limit opportunities for imitation (Maskus, 2000, p. 8).”
• CEO Hubris and Firm Risk Taking in China: The Moderating Role of Managerial Discretion (2010, background): “Making such investments in China was particularly risky, as China’s transition economy had a poorly developed technological and institutional environment during the study period (Maskus, 2000).”
• Intellectual Property Rights, Foreign Direct Investment, and Industrial Development (2011, unknown): “� + g ( 20 ) 10 Our core results would still hold if the risk of imitation of Northern …rms were set at some constant rate greater than zero but less than that faced by multinational …rms.”
• The Contribution of Skilled Immigration and International Graduate Students to U.S. Innovation (2005, background): “26 corporations have significantly increased patenting activity and innovation abroad (Maskus 2000) and recent evidence indicates that the U.”
• Does Institutional Reform of Intellectual Property Rights Lead to More Inbound FDI? Evidence from Latin America and the Caribbean (2011, unknown): “…IPRs in developing countries disproportionately benefits foreign MNEs and their home countries (Feinberg & Majumdar, 2001) or promotes greater societal respect for industrial innovation that benefits host countries (Forero- Pineda, 2006; Maskus, 2000; Meyer & Sinani, 2009; Sherwood, 1997).”
• Exchanging development for market access? Deep integration and industrial policy under multilateral and regional-bilateral trade agreements (2005, unknown): “TRIPS establishes new global standards regarding the granting and protection of patents (along with other forms of IPRs), and these standards have vitally important implications for developing countries ( Correa, 2000a ; Maskus, 2000 ; CIPR, 2002 ).”
• Encouraging International Technology Transfer (2004, background): “Whether imitation is legal or illegal depends on the scope of intellectual property protection and the security of trade secrets from unfair competition (Maskus, 2000).”
• Indicators of the Relative Importance of IPRs in Developing Countries (2003, background): “UNCTAD/ICTSD Capacity Building Project on IPRs 5 Theory also suggests that the benefits of IPRs rise with income and that at very low levels the costs of strengthening IPRs may well outweigh the gains. Maskus (2000) notes three potential costs.”
• Parallel Imports and Price Controls (2008, background): “�0(pS) = � (pS) + m�(pN) , ( 14 ) 18 The details of these calculations are available from the authors upon request.”