Practical Significance:The Use of Effect Sizes in School Counseling Research
By C. Sink, Heather R. Stroh. 2006
227 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c85b992e3de441796c5104eacf48c76f48a4d061
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
- Olivia Uwamahoro
- D. Kohlhausen
- M. Reyes
- Daniel Gutierrez
- Steve Werner
- Joon Hyung Park
- JéAnna Lanza Abbott
- Susan E. Rivers
Citations in the corpus
- Burnout, Stress, and Direct Student Services Among School Counselors (2016, background): “However, it should be noted that the effect sizes of these findings were small to medium (Sink & Stroh, 2006).”
- Enhancing academic performance and social and emotional competence with the RULER feeling words curriculum (2012, methodology): “Effect sizes were computed using partial η2, and interpreted as follows: small=0.01; medium=0.06; large=0.14 (Sink & Stroh, 2006).”
- Evaluating Evidence for Conceptually Related Constructs Using Bivariate Correlations (2017, background): “Researchers should also consider the context of their study, as effect size can be influenced by various factors (e.g., sample size, normality, and scale type; see Thompson, 2002, and Sink & Stroh, 2006, for a detailed discussion on effect sizes).”
- Development of Counseling Students’ Self-Efficacy During Preparation and Training (2015, methodology): “For the current study, the internal consistency reliability for the CSES was acceptable, with a Cronbach’s alpha of .96 (Sink & Stroh, 2006; Streiner, 2003).”
- Customer-Centric Science: Reporting Significant Research Results With Rigor, Relevance, and Practical Impact in Mind (2010, background): “Several sources exist that provide detailed guidelines and formulae regarding the computation of various types of effect magnitude estimates (e.g., Huberty, 2002; Kirk, 1996; Kline, 2004; Sink & Stroh, 2006; Snyder & Lawson, 1993; Vacha-Haase & Thompson, 2004).”
- An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers. (2009, unknown): “Nonetheless, the use of effect size measures remains inconsistent (Fidler et al., 2005; Osborne, 2008; Sink & Stroh, 2006).”