A Multilevel Model of Privatization in Emerging Economies

By Ravi Ramamurti. 2000

266 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c82608d055c989c4d54ec5e63d5d1920f366f269

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

Citations in the corpus

The development of entrepreneurship in China (2008, background): “, 2000), transaction cost economics (Boisot & Child, 1988; Ramamurti, 2000), stakeholder theory (George & Prabhu, 2000), and neoinstitutional perspective (Boisot & Child, 1996; Nee, 1992) have been mainly employed as the theoretical perspectives to explain the above issues.”
Governance, organizational capabilities, and restructuring in transition economies (2003, background): “However, restructuring processes are not yet fully understood (Ramamurti, 2000; Spicer et al., 2000).”
Sustaining superior performance in an emerging economy: an empirical test in the Indian context (2012, methodology): “As argued by Ramamurti (2000), the move away from socialistic systems toward privatization, or market oriented economic activity, has strong political implications and is therefore pursued cautiously.”
Latin America Management Research: Review, Synthesis, and Extension (2011, background): “Governance in the context of privatization has also been a rich area for conceptual development (Dharwadkar, George, & Brandes, 2000; George & Prabhu, 2000; Ramamurti, 2000; Zahra, Ireland, Gutierrez, & Hitt, 2000).”
Asset restructuring and business group affiliation in French civil law countries (2004, background): “The reduction of government involvement increases the decision-making discretion of firms, improves the efficiency of governance mechanisms, and reduces the barriers to trade and investments (Ramamurti, 2000).”
Beyond institutional voids: Business groups, incomplete markets, and organizational form (2015, background): “The dismantling of state controls—deregulation and privatization—removes constraints on entry into product markets and opens up opportunities that were hitherto not available (Haveman, Russo, and Meyer, 2001; Ramamurti, 2000).”
Promarket Reforms and Firm profitability in Developing Countries (2009, result): “This approach complements other research that has focused on the impact of individual dimensions on firms (Hay, 2001; Kim & Prescott, 2005; Megginson & Netter, 2001; Mitton, 2006; Ramamurti, 2000).”
Diversified Business Groups and Corporate Refocusing in Emerging Economies (2005, background): “In addition to trade liberalization, widespread privatizations have been implemented in many countries to further improve economic efficiency (Megginson & Netter, 2001; Ramamurti, 2000).”
Internationalization and innovation performance of emerging market enterprises: The role of host-country institutional development (2016, background): “We should also note however, that ownership ties with government may also reduce innovativeness because firms often have to accommodate social concerns and needs of the government (Ramamurti, 2000).”
New Varieties of State Capitalism: Strategic and Governance Implications (2015, background): “…been an attempt to uncover what determines this performance gap, either by looking at different ownership configurations (Cuervo & Villalonga, 2000; Ramamurti, 2000) or by outlining institutional conditions that may lead to smaller performance gaps (Bartel & Harrison, 2005; Mahmood & Rufin, 2005;…”
State Ownership and Firm Innovation in China: An Integrated View of Institutional and Efficiency Logics (2017, background): “In emerging economies, institutional voids, such as shallow capital markets, shortages of skilled labor, weak legal enforcement, and a lack of independent financial intermediaries, seriously hinder firms’ operation and development (Khanna and Palepu, 1997; Hoskisson et al., 2000; Ramamurti, 2000), i”
Market liberalization and firm performance during China's economic transition (2006, background): “The first is an 'external drive' argument, based on agency theory, which states that poorly performing SOEs tend to be privatized because the government wants them to improve performance (Ramamurti, 2000).”