Patenting and Licensing University Inventions: Lessons from the History of the Research Corporation

By David C. Mowery, Bhaven N. Sampat. 2001

153 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c7e4b87f9b4459df241483541a2dc080d7016619

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Citations in the corpus

Changes in university patent quality after the Bayh-Dole act: a re-examination (2003, background): “Third, and perhaps most importantly, it offered strong Congressional endorsement of active university involvement patenting and licensing, activities that they historically had avoided (Mowery and Sampat 2001b, Mowery et al. 2001).”
The nexus between science and industry: evidence from faculty inventions (2012, background): “The ownership of intellectual property rights had to be negotiated case by case before Bayh-Dole ( Mowery and Sampat 2001 ).”
Reconsidering the Bayh-Dole Act and the Current University Invention Ownership Model (2009, background): “Universities have a long history of generating inventions having commercial value and having these used by industry (e.g., Geiger 2004; Mowery and Sampat 2001; Rosenberg and Nelson 1994).”
Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems (2004, unknown): “two) and its long history of involvement in patenting — Columbia gradually entered into patenting activities only after the passage of the Bayh–Dole Act, in, 1980 (Mowery et al., 2001; Mowery, Sampat, and Ziedonis, 2001).”
Understanding the concept of the entrepreneurial university from the perspective of higher education models (2014, background): “…a wide range of activities such as patenting and licensing (see Baldini, 2006; Henderson et al., 1998; Mowery, Nelson, Sampat, & Ziedonis, 2001, 2004; Mowery & Sampat, 2001; Sampat, 2006; Shane, 2004), spin-out formation based on results of research (Etzkowitz, 2008), contract research (see Clark,…”
University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature (2007, background): “(continued) U n iversity en trep ren eu rsh ip 7 6 9 Table 5 Continued Study Research question(s) Data Dependent variable(s) Key findings Mowery and Sampat (2001a) What the history of the Research Corporation can tell about the trend and challenges of managing universities’ licensing?”
The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and University–Industry Technology Transfer: A Model for Other OECD Governments? (2004, background): “The Research Corporation, founded in 1912 by Frederick Cottrell, a University of California faculty inventor who wished to use the licensing revenues from his patents to support scientific research, assumed a prominent role as a manager of university patents and licensing.”
The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and University--Industry Technology Transfer: A Model for Other OECD Governments? (2004, unknown): “Other institutions relied on third-party specialists in patent management such as the Research Corporation ( Mowery and Sampat, 2001a; 2001b ).”