The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and University--Industry Technology Transfer: A Model for Other OECD Governments?

By David C. Mowery, Bhaven N. Sampat. 2004

167 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/85947dd0cea8622946ecd6052d10f099ce43d48a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. David B. Audretsch
2. Robert Huggins
3. Erik E. Lehmann
4. Mike Wright
5. Andrew Johnston
6. Carolin Haeussler
7. Rebecca Steffenson
8. B. Lundvall

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Robert Huggins
2. David B. Audretsch
3. Erik E. Lehmann
4. Andrew Johnston
5. Mike Wright
6. Carolin Haeussler
7. David Urbano
8. Rebecca Steffenson

In Strategy and Management

1. David B. Audretsch
2. Robert Huggins
3. Erik E. Lehmann
4. Andrew Johnston
5. Carolin Haeussler
6. Mike Wright
7. Rebecca Steffenson
8. B. Lundvall

Citations in the corpus

• Universities, knowledge networks and regional policy (2008, background): “…university patenting is essential for effective technology transfer from universities to industry, but critics argue that these policy transfer models overlook more economically important channels through which universities contribute to innovation and economic growth (Mowery and Sampat, 2004).”
• 30 Years after Bayh-Dole: Reassessing Academic Entrepreneurship (2011, unknown): “predict the evolving features of institutional IPR ownership systems in Europe (Verspagen, 2006; Mowery and Sampat, 2005).”
• Does inventor ownership encourage university research-derived entrepreneurship? A six university comparison (2011, unknown): “and widespread diffusion of the university ownership regime globally (see Fini et al., in this issue; Mowery and Sampat, 2005; So et al., 2008).”
• Breaking the Ivory Tower: Academic Entrepreneurship in the Life Sciences in UK and Germany (2011, background): “Under the logic of facilitating innovation and increasing knowledge flows to companies , public initiatives have turned to formal technology transfer (TT), largely targeting intellectual property (IP) and faculty participation in commerce (Mowery and Sampat, 2004; Geuna and Nesta, 2006).”
• Technology transfer in a global economy (2012, background): “Starting with the Bayle–Dole Act of 1980 in the US, and continued by, among others, the European Union with the Lisbon-Agenda in 2002, most OECD countries reacted to these new challenges (Mowery and Sampat 2005; Cosh and Hughes 2010).”
• National Systems of Innovation: Post Script: Innovation System Research – Where It Came From and Where It Might Go (2010, background): “As documented by Mowery and Sampat (2004) the interpretation of the ‘success’ of this reform in Europe has been exaggerated.”