Changes in university patent quality after the Bayh-Dole act: a re-examination

By Bhaven N. Sampat, David C. Mowery, Arvids A. Ziedonis. 2003

300 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bf5c670a8fe164a3d8322e186c33e597acfa7b80

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

Citations in the corpus

University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature (2007, background): “The Bayh-Dole Act provided incentives for universities to increase patenting in those fields in which licensing is an effective mechanism for acquiring new technical knowledge.”
How organizational structures in science shape spin-off firms: the biochemistry departments of Berkeley, Stanford, and UCSF and the birth of the biotech industry (2006, background): “The existing literature, which does attempt to address variations across scientific institutions in the success with which university science is commercialized, on the one hand consists of studies that focus on the practices of technology-licensing offices (Mowery et al., 2004; Sampat et al., 2003; ”
Commercializing academic research: the quality of faculty patenting (2011, background): “Examples of studies on the potential effects of the Bayh-Dole Act are Henderson et al. (1998), Mowery and Ziedonis (2002), Mowery et al. (2002), and Sampat et al. (2003).”
Assessing the Regional Economic Development Impacts of Universities: A Review of Current Approaches (2007, background): “More recent analyses, however, suggest that it is the time distribution of university patent citations that is changing rather than the total citation impact over time (Mowery and Ziedonis 2000; Mowery, Sampat, and Ziedonis 2002; Sampat, Mowery, and Ziedonis 2003).”
Inside or Outside the IP-System? Business Creation in Academia (2010, background): “…patenting (Bercovitz and Feldman, 2008; Coupe, 2003; Hall et al., 2001; Henderson et al., 1998; Mowery et al., 2002; Mowery and Ziedonis, 2002; Sampat et al., 2003), licensing (Jensen and Thursby, 2001; Jensen et al., 2003), and the creation of new businesses to exploit university-assigned…”
The Contribution of Skilled Immigration and International Graduate Students to U.S. Innovation (2005, background): “universities to commercialize research results (Sampat et al., 2003; Mowery et al., 2001).”
Institutional determinants of university spin-off quantity and quality: a longitudinal, multilevel, cross-country study (2016, background): “However, it has been debated whether the increasing number of patents reflects an average lower quality of these patents (Henderson et al. 1998; Sampat et al. 2003) or have other negative effects on the impact of university technology transfer (Czarnitzki et al. 2009).”
The nexus between science and industry: evidence from faculty inventions (2012, background): “More precisely, we expect patents in the scientific sector to be cited later than corporate patents (Sampat et al., 2003).”
Categories of university-level entrepreneurship: a literature survey (2010, background): “Owen-Smith and Powell (2001) Agrawal and Henderson (2002) Cohen et al. (2002) Feldman et al. (2002) Mowery et al. (2002) Mowery and Ziedonis (2002) Shane (2002) Thursby and Thursby (2002) Coupe (2003) Friedman and Silberman (2003) Hall et al. (2003) Nerkar and Shane (2003) Nicolaou and Birley (2003)”