Contingent valuation: Environmental polling or preference engine?

By D. Macmillan, N. Hanley, N. Lienhoop. 2006

183 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c77e1ad2fb97fd9bffe437834e0fb0c2dd30d6ef

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In General Decision Sciences

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Citations in the corpus

Consumers' preference for renewable energy in the southwest USA (2011, background): “The above statement is used to inform the participants about the wind energy initiative in NM. Previous CV surveys have shown that a lack of familiarity with the good being valued may affect WTP estimates (MacMillan et al., 2006).”
The importance of deliberation in valuing ecosystem services in developing countries - evidence from the Solomon Islands (2011, background): “The importance of information and discussion to valuation has been expressed many times (Arrow et al., 1993; Hoehn and Randall, 2002; Macmillan et al., 2006; Niemeyer and Spash, 2001; Schiffman and Kanuk, 1991; Spash, 2002, 2007, 2008a; Urama and Hodge, 2006; Whilehead and Blomquist, 1991;…”
Using Internet in Stated Preference Surveys: A Review and Comparison of Survey Modes (2011, unknown): “…recently, environmental economists have come to view preferences as constructed or learnt at the time of elicitation, at least when the preference object is unfamiliar to the respondent and/or she has little previous experience with it (McFadden, 1999; MacMillan et al., 2006; Bateman et al., 2008).”
Deliberative monetary valuation (DMV): Issues in combining economic and political processes to value environmental change (2007, background): “A rangeof papers have recently appeared on this topic (e.g., Gregory and Wellman, 2001; Niemeyer and Spash, 2001; Spash, 2001b; Macmillan et al., 2002, 2006; Wilson and Howarth, 2002; Aldred, 2005; James and Blamey, 2005; Howarth andWilson, 2006; Lienhoop and MacMillan, 2007) adding to earlier…”
Bringing Ecosystem Services into the Real World: An Operational Framework for Assessing the Economic Consequences of Losing Wild Nature (2011, background): “goods such as some ecosystem services can even be revealed (Gowdy and Erickson 2005; MacMillan et al. 2006).”
Deliberative Monetary Valuation: In Search of a Democratic and Value Plural Approach to Environmental Policy (2013, methodology): “Typical arguments are the lack of time to reflect or engage in arbitrage (Macmillan et al., 2002, 2006; Robinson et al., 2009) and respondents’ inadequate cognitive capacity to understand the welfare trade-offs being requested under such circumstances (Gregory and Slovic, 1997; McDaniels et al.,…”
Capturing the complexity of biodiversity: A critical review of economic valuation studies of biological diversity (2015, background): “…when biodiversity is valued via stated preferences methods, the main challenge is to determine the right amount of information provided to respondents that allows them to thoroughly understand the valuation object but does not lead to a cognitive overstrain (e.g., MacMillan et al., 2006).”
Deliberative Monetary Valuation and the Evidence for a New Value Theory (2008, background): “Thus Macmillan et al. (2002, 2006) are found to bound choice with a payment card; Urama and Hodge (2006) allude to an open process, while tightly focussing on consequential relationships reinforced by repeated education sessions; and in several studies, the moderator makes sure people conform to…”
Shared values and deliberative valuation: Future directions (2016, background): “Deliberation has been proposed both as an answer to methodological problems within monetary (and to a lesser degree non-monetary) valuation (Alvarez Farizo and Hanley, 2006; Alvarez Farizo et al., 2007; Bunse et al., 2015; Lienhoop and Hanley, 2006; Lienhoop and MacMillan, 2007; Raymond et al., 2014”
Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Renewable Energy: A Meta-Regression Analysis (2015, background): “Numerous studies have investigated people’s stated intentions to purchase electricity from renewable sources (e.g. Aravena et al., 2012; MacMillan et al., 2006).”