Bringing Ecosystem Services into the Real World: An Operational Framework for Assessing the Economic Consequences of Losing Wild Nature

172 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Ecosystem services (2011, unknown): “On the basis of their work on the economic consequences of biodiversity loss, Balmford et al. (2011) suggest a threefold division between ‘core ecosystem processes’, ‘beneficial ecosystem processes’ and ‘ecosystem benefits’; they then go on to rank the beneficial processes in terms of their importan”
Integrating ecological, economic and social aspects to generate useful management information under the EU Directives' ‘ecosystem approach’ (2012, background): “…provide a wide range of ecosystem services benefits, such as food production and recreation, while at the same time providing a wide panoply of regulatory and support ES, as nutrient cycling and water purification (Balmford et al., 2002, 2011; Bateman et al., 2011; MEA, 2003; Turner et al., 2003).”
Species-rich dung beetle communities buffer ecosystem services in perturbed agro-ecosystems (2012, unknown): “vices important in agricultural output and sustainability (Bateman et al. 2010; Burkhard, Petrosillo & Costanza 2010; Balmford et al. 2011).”